
Int J Performability Eng ›› 2025, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (4): 226-234.doi: 10.23940/ijpe.25.04.p6.226234
Meroua Sahraouia,*, Ahmed Bellaouara, Abdoul-Razac Sanéb, and Fouad Malikic
Submitted on
;
Revised on
;
Accepted on
Contact:
*E-mail address: Meroua Sahraoui, Ahmed Bellaouar, Abdoul-Razac Sané, and Fouad Maliki. Multi-Objective Optimization of Production Lines using Multi-Agent Systems Modeling and Genetic Algorithms: A Case Study [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2025, 21(4): 226-234.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
| [1] Tjahjono B., Esplugues C., Ares E., andPelaez G., 2017. What does industry 4.0 mean to supply chain?. [2] Baptista L.F., andBarata J., 2021. Piloting industry 4.0 in SMEs with RAMI 4.0: an enterprise architecture approach. [3] Salih A., Alsalhi L., andAbou-Moghli A., 2024. Entrepreneurial orientation and digital transformation as drivers of high organizational performance: Evidence from Iraqi private bank. [4] Abusalma A., Al-Oraini B., Al-Daoud K., andAlshurideh M.T., 2024. The impact of supply chain performance on financial performance: dimensions of the SCOR model.Uncertain Supply Chain Manag, 11(3), pp. 1409-1416, 2024. [5] Velda A.M.E.,2019. Impact of supply chain management practices on financial performance: case study of automotive suppliers in morocco. In2019 International Colloquium on Logistics and Supply Chain Management (LOGISTIQUA), pp. 1-5. [6] Collins A., Petty M., Vernon-Bido D., andSherfey S., 2015. A call to arms: standards for agent-based modeling and simulation. [7] Yang W., andTakakuwa S., 2017. Simulation-based dynamic shop floor scheduling for a flexible manufacturing system in the industry 4.0 environment. In2017 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), pp. 3908-3916. [8] Xie J., andLiu C.C., 2017. Multi-agent systems and their applications. [9] Shen W., Hao Q., Yoon H.J., andNorrie D.H., 2006. Applications of agent-based systems in intelligent manufacturing: an updated review. [10] Leitão P., Colombo A.W., andKarnouskos S., 2016. Industrial automation based on cyber-physical systems technologies: prototype implementations and challenges. [11] Hussain M.S., andAli M., 2019. A multi-agent based dynamic scheduling of flexible manufacturing systems. [12] Sabar M., Montreuil B., andFrayret J.M., 2009. A multi-agent-based approach for personnel scheduling in assembly centers. [13] Bouaouda A., andSayouti Y., 2022. Hybrid meta-heuristic algorithms for optimal sizing of hybrid renewable energy system: a review of the state-of-the-art. [14] Jebari H., El Azzouzi S.R., andSamadi H., 2015. Hybridation des métaheuristiques pour la résolution de problème d'ordonnancement multi-objectif dans un atelier flow-shop. In [15] Ojstersek R., Brezocnik M., andBuchmeister B., 2020. Multi-objective optimization of production scheduling with evolutionary computation: A review. [16] Deb K., Pratap A., Agarwal S., andMeyarivan T.A.M.T., 2002. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. [17] Deb K.,2011. Multi-objective optimisation using evolutionary algorithms: an introduction. InMulti-Objective Evolutionary Optimisation for Product Design and Manufacturing, pp. 3-34. [18] Zhou A., Qu B.Y., Li H., Zhao S.Z., Suganthan P.N., andZhang Q., 2011. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A survey of the state of the art. |
| [1] | Dattatray Hulwan, Avadhoot Rajurkar, and Adwait Gaikwad. Implementation of Industry 4.0 in Manufacturing Industry: An Autonomous Mobile Robots Case Study [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2025, 21(4): 188-198. |
| [2] | Meroua Sahraoui and Ahmed Bellaouar. Improving Industrial Production Efficiency: A Hybrid Approach to Dynamic Scheduling - A Case Study [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2025, 21(2): 104-111. |
| [3] | Kalyani H. Deshmukh, Gajendra R. Bamnote, and Pratik K Agrawal. A Novel Approach for Drought Monitoring and Evaluation using Time Series Analysis and Deep Learning [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2024, 20(8): 498-509. |
| [4] | Koteswarapavan Chivukula and Laxmi Narayan Pattanaik. Effects of Industry 4.0 Technologies on Lean Manufacturing and Organizational Performances: An Empirical Study using Structural Equation Modelling [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2024, 20(6): 355-366. |
| [5] | Meroua Sahraoui and Ahmed Bellaouar. A New Modeling Approach to Enhance Reliability, Availability, Maintainability, and Performance of Production System Equipment in a Supply Chain [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2024, 20(4): 242-252. |
| [6] | Hak Gupta Sindhu, Tyagi Abhishek, and Sharma Richa. Predicting the Spectral and Energy Efficiency of LTE Network [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2024, 20(10): 640-647. |
| [7] | Khushi Wadhwa and Himanshi Babbar. Digital Twin in the Motorized (Automotive / Vehicle) Industry [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(9): 568-578. |
| [8] | Mini Agarwal and Bharat Bhushan Agarwal. Methodical Implementation of Data Mining Classifiers and ANN for Prediction of Accomplishment of Student Education [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(9): 587-597. |
| [9] | Anmol Suryavanshi and Sanjeev Kumar Sharma. Result Analysis of the Improved Contiguous Memory Allocation (ICMA) Approach in the Linux Kernel Research [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(11): 753-761. |
| [10] | Jinxin Wang, Zhiping Zhai, Yuezheng Lan, Xiaoyi Zhai, and Lixiang Zhao. Reliability Analysis and Optimization of Forage Crushers Based on Bayesian Network [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(10): 700-709. |
| [11] | Pawan Wawage, Yogesh Deshpande, and Kumar Manav. Analysis of Factors Influencing Safe Driving Behavior in Indian Context using Manchester Driver Behavior Questionnaire [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(1): 76-84. |
| [12] | Sanjay Razdan, Himanshu Gupta, and Ashish Seth. A Multi-Layer Feed Forward Network Intrusion Detection System using Individual Component Optimization Methodology for Cloud Computing [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2022, 18(11): 781-790. |
| [13] | Tae-Jin Yang. Comparative Analysis on the Reliability Performance of NHPP Software Reliability Model Applying Exponential-Type Lifetime Distribution [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2022, 18(10): 679-689. |
| [14] | D. Sobya, S. Nallusamy, Partha Sarathi Chakraborty. Improvement of Overall Performance by Implementation of Different Lean Tools - A Case Study [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2021, 17(9): 804-814. |
| [15] | Kiran Chaudhari, Nilesh P. Salunke, Vijay R. Diware. A Comprehensive Review on Performance Improvement of Diesel and Biodiesel fueled CI Engines using Additives [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2021, 17(9): 815-824. |
|