
Int J Performability Eng ›› 2025, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (8): 422-428.doi: 10.23940/ijpe.25.08.p2.422428
Previous Articles Next Articles
Huthaifa Al-Khazraji* and Mohammed Majid Msallam
Submitted on
;
Revised on
;
Accepted on
Contact:
*E-mail address: Huthaifa Al-Khazraji, Mohammed Majid Msallam. A Two-Stage Model for Condition-Based Maintenance using Machine Learning Algorithms [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2025, 21(8): 422-428.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
| [1] Teixeira H.N., Lopes I., andBraga A.C., 2020. Condition-based maintenance implementation: a literature review. [2] Van Horenbeek A., andPintelon L., 2013. A dynamic predictive maintenance policy for complex multi-component systems. [3] Zonta T., Da Costa C.A., da Rosa Righi R., de Lima M.J., Da Trindade E.S., andLi G.P., 2020. Predictive maintenance in the industry 4.0: A systematic literature review. [4] Abood A.M., Nasser A.R., andAl-Khazraji H., 2022. Predictive maintenance of electromechanical systems using deep learning algorithms. [5] Karatuğ Ç., Arslanoğlu Y., andSoares C.G., 2023. Design of a decision support system to achieve condition-based maintenance in ship machinery systems. [6] Hrnjica B., andSoftic S., 2020. Explainable AI in manufacturing: a predictive maintenance case study. InIFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems, pp. 66-73. [7] Cardoso D., andFerreira L., 2020. Application of predictive maintenance concepts using artificial intelligence tools. [8] Cai Y., Teunter R.H., andde Jonge B., 2023. A data-driven approach for condition-based maintenance optimization. [9] Hadi R.H., Hady H.N., Hasan A.M., Al-Jodah A., andHumaidi A.J., 2023. Improved fault classification for predictive maintenance in industrial IoT based on AutoML: A case study of ball-bearing faults. [10] Qureshi M.S., Umar S., andNawaz M.U., 2024. Machine learning for predictive maintenance in solar farms. [11] Maione F., Lino P., Maione G., andGiannino G., 2024. A machine learning framework for condition-based maintenance of marine diesel engines: a case study. [12] Nasser A., andAl-Khazraji H., 2022. A hybrid of convolutional neural network and long short-term memory network approach to predictive maintenance. [13] Jakubowski J., Stanisz P., Bobek S., andNalepa G.J., 2021. Anomaly detection in asset degradation process using variational autoencoder and explanations. [14] Autran J.V., Kuhn V., Diguet J.P., Dubois M., andBuche C., 2024. AI4I-PMDI: predictive maintenance datasets with complex industrial settings’ irregularities. [15] Qi Z., Feng Y., Wang S., andLi C., 2025. Enhancing hydropower generation Predictions: A comprehensive study of XGBoost and Support Vector Regression models with advanced optimization techniques. [16] Batchu R.K., andSeetha H., 2022. An integrated approach explaining the detection of distributed denial of service attacks. [17] Rai R., Tiwari M.K., Ivanov D., andDolgui A., 2021. Machine learning in manufacturing and industry 4.0 applications. [18] Benítez-Andrades J.A., Prada-García C., Ordás-Reyes N., Blanco M.E., Merayo A., andSerrano-García A., 2025. Enhanced prediction of spine surgery outcomes using advanced machine learning techniques and oversampling methods. [19] Bhavsar H., andGanatra A., 2012. A comparative study of training algorithms for supervised machine learning. [20] Montesinos López O.A., Montesinos López A., andCrossa J., 2022. Support vector machines and support vector regression. InMultivariate Statistical Machine Learning Methods for Genomic Prediction, pp. 337-378. [21] Ambrish G., Ganesh B., Ganesh A., Srinivas C., andMensinkal K., 2022. Logistic regression technique for prediction of cardiovascular disease. [22] Bhavitha B.K., Rodrigues A.P., andChiplunkar N.N., 2017. Comparative study of machine learning techniques in sentimental analysis. In2017 International Conference on Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies (ICICCT), pp. 216-221. [23] Naiem S., Khedr A.E., Idrees A.M., andMarie M.I., 2023. Enhancing the efficiency of gaussian naïve bayes machine learning classifier in the detection of DDOS in cloud computing. [24] Matzka S.,2020. Explainable artificial intelligence for predictive maintenance applications. In2020 Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Industries (Ai4i), pp. 69-74. [25] Gül A., andAdalı E., 2017. A feature selection algorithm for IDS. In2017 International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK), pp. 816-820. [26] Ehsani F., andHosseini M., 2025. Customer churn analysis using feature optimization methods and tree-based classifiers. |
| [1] | Sonu Mittal and Tanya Gupta. Comparative Analysis of Efficient Text Classification Models using Pre-Trained Transformers [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2025, 21(6): 299-307. |
| [2] | Sushant Kumar Singh. Emotion-Aware Music Recommendation System using Facial Expression Analysis [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2025, 21(6): 326-331. |
| [3] | Qian Zhang and Dongcheng Li. Fusion Mutation-Based Test Generation and XGBoost-Driven Prioritization for Image Classification DNNs [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2025, 21(5): 235-248. |
| [4] | Sumit Badotra. Machine Learning Enabled Model Against DDoS Detection using Software Defined Networking [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2025, 21(4): 219-225. |
| [5] | Ashu Mehta, Navdeep Kaur, and Amandeep Kaur. A Review of Software Fault Prediction Techniques in Class Imbalance Scenarios [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2025, 21(3): 123-130. |
| [6] | Vikas, Charu Wahi, Bharat Bhushan Sagar, and Manisha Manjul. Trust Management in WSN using ML for Detection of DDoS Attacks [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2025, 21(3): 157-167. |
| [7] | Arpna Saxena and Sangeeta Mittal. CluSHAPify: Synergizing Clustering and SHAP Value Interpretations for Improved Reconnaissance Attack Detection in IIoT Networks [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2025, 21(1): 36-47. |
| [8] | Seema Kalonia and Amrita Upadhyay. Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Model and PSO Optimized CNN-RNN for Software Fault Prediction [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2025, 21(1): 48-55. |
| [9] | Vikas Kumar, Charu Wahi, Bharat Bhushan Sagar, and Manisha Manjul. Ensemble Learning Based Intrusion Detection for Wireless Sensor Network Environment [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2024, 20(9): 541-551. |
| [10] | Kalyani H. Deshmukh, Gajendra R. Bamnote, and Pratik K Agrawal. A Novel Approach for Drought Monitoring and Evaluation using Time Series Analysis and Deep Learning [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2024, 20(8): 498-509. |
| [11] | Saurabh Saxena, and Chetna Gupta. Optimizing Bug Resolution: A Data-Driven Developer Recommendation System [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2024, 20(8): 510-519. |
| [12] | Lakshya Vaswani, Sai Sri Harsha, Subham Jaiswal, and Aju D. Unravelling Complexity: Investigating the Effectiveness of SHAP Algorithm for Improving Explainability in Network Intrusion System Across Machine and Deep Learning Models [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2024, 20(7): 421-431. |
| [13] | Meenakshi Chawla and Meenakshi Pareek. A Hybrid Deep Learning Perspective for Software Effort Estimation [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2024, 20(7): 442-450. |
| [14] | Ajeet Kumar Sharma and Rakesh Kumar. IoT Malware Detection and Dynamic Analysis of MQTT Simulated Network [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2024, 20(7): 451-459. |
| [15] | Abhishek Gupta and Jaspreet Singh. Data-Driven Security Framework for VANET using Firefly and ANN [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2024, 20(6): 344-354. |
|