Int J Performability Eng ›› 2024, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (7): 442-450.doi: 10.23940/ijpe.24.07.p4.442450
Previous Articles Next Articles
Meenakshi Chawla and Meenakshi Pareek*
Submitted on
;
Revised on
;
Accepted on
Contact:
*E-mail address: Meenakshi Chawla and Meenakshi Pareek. A Hybrid Deep Learning Perspective for Software Effort Estimation [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2024, 20(7): 442-450.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
[1] Garcia-Diaz N., Lopez-Martin C. and Chavoya A., 2013. A comparative study of two fuzzy logic models for software development effort estimation.Procedia Technology,7, pp.305-314. [2] Sheta A., Rine D. and Ayesh A., 2008, June. Development of software effort and schedule estimation models using soft computing techniques. In2008 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (IEEE world congress on computational intelligence)(pp. 1283-1289). IEEE. [3] Aljahdali, S. and Sheta, A.F., 2010, May. Software effort estimation by tuning COOCMO model parameters using differential evolution. InACS/IEEE International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications-AICCSA 2010(pp. 1-6). IEEE. [4] Suresh Kumar, P. and Behera, H.S., 2020. Role of soft computing techniques in software effort estimation: an analytical study. InComputational Intelligence in Pattern Recognition: Proceedings of CIPR 2019(pp. 807-831). Springer Singapore. [5] Kathleen Peters, Software Project Estimation. https://courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/cse403/07sp/assignments/estimationbasics.pdf, accessed on July 1, 2024. [6] Chen, W.N. and Zhang, J., 2012. Ant colony optimization for software project scheduling and staffing with an event-based scheduler.IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering,39(1), pp.1-17. [7] Reynolds C.W.,1987, August. Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model. InProceedings of the 14th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques(pp. 25-34). [8] PVGDP R., CHVMK H. and Rao T.S., 2011. Multi objective particle swarm optimization for software cost estimation.Int J Comput Appl,32(3), pp.13-17. [9] Novitasari D., Cholissodin I. and Mahmudy W.F., 2016. Optimizing svr using local best pso for software effort estimation.Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science,1(1), pp.28-37. [10] Bilgaiyan S., Aditya K., Mishra S. and Das M., 2018. A swarm intelligence based chaotic morphological approach for software development cost estimation.International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications (IJISA), ISSN, pp.2074-9058. [11] Sethi T.S., Hari C.V., Kaushal B.S.S. and Sharma A., 2011. Cluster analysis & Pso for software cost estimation. InInformation Technology and Mobile Communication: International Conference, AIM 2011, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India, April 21-22, 2011. Proceedings(pp. 281-286). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [12] Khatibi Bardsiri V., Jawawi D.N.A., Hashim S.Z.M. and Khatibi E., 2013. A PSO-based model to increase the accuracy of software development effort estimation.Software Quality Journal,21, pp.501-526. [13] Kumar A., Sinhal A. and Verma B., 2013. A novel technique of optimization for software metric using PSO.International Journal of Soft Computing And Software Engineering,3(10), pp.2251-7545. [14] Benala T.R., Chinnababu K., Mall R. and Dehuri S., 2013. A particle swarm optimized functional link artificial neural network (PSO-FLANN) in software cost estimation. InProceedings of the International Conference on Frontiers of Intelligent Computing: Theory and Applications (FICTA)(pp. 59-66). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [15] Dan Z.,2013, July. Improving the accuracy in software effort estimation: Using artificial neural network model based on particle swarm optimization. InProceedings of 2013 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics(pp. 180-185). IEEE. [16] Khatibi Bardsiri V., Jawawi D.N.A., Hashim S.Z.M. and Khatibi E., 2014. A flexible method to estimate the software development effort based on the classification of projects and localization of comparisons.Empirical Software Engineering,19, pp.857-884. [17] Kaur, M. and Sehra, S.K., 2014, February. Particle swarm optimization based effort estimation using Function Point analysis. In2014 International Conference on Issues and Challenges in Intelligent Computing Techniques (ICICT)(pp. 140-145). IEEE. [18] Liu Q., Chu X., Xiao J. and Zhu H., 2014, July. Optimizing non-orthogonal space distance using pso in software cost estimation. In2014 IEEE 38th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference(pp. 21-26). IEEE. [19] Benala T.R., Mall R., Dehuri S. and Swetha P., 2015. Software effort estimation using functional link neural networks tuned with active learning and optimized with particle swarm optimization. In Swarm, Evolutionary, and Memetic Computing: 5th International Conference, SEMCCO 2014, Bhubaneswar, India, December 18-20, 2014, Revised Selected Papers 5 (pp. 223-238). Springer International Publishing. [20] Nanda, S. and Soewito, B., 2016, July. Modeling software effort estimation using hybrid PSO-ANFIS. In2016 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA)(pp. 219-224). IEEE. [21] Langsari, K. and Sarno, R., 2017, September. Optimizing effort and time parameters of COCOMO II estimation using fuzzy multi-objective PSO. In2017 4th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Informatics (EECSI)(pp. 1-6). IEEE. [22] Wu D., Li J. and Bao C., 2018. Case-based reasoning with optimized weight derived by particle swarm optimization for software effort estimation.Soft Computing,22, pp.5299-5310. [23] Shahpar Z., Bardsiri V.K. and Bardsiri A.K., 2021. Polynomial analogy‐based software development effort estimation using combined particle swarm optimization and simulated annealing.Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience,33(20), p.e6358. [24] Khan M.S., Jabeen F., Ghouzali S., Rehman Z., Naz S. and Abdul W., 2021. Metaheuristic algorithms in optimizing deep neural network model for software effort estimation.Ieee Access,9, pp.60309-60327. [25] Kumar, K.H. and Srinivas, K., 2023. An accurate analogy based software effort estimation using hybrid optimization and machine learning techniques.Multimedia Tools and Applications,82(20), pp.30463-30490. [26] Marco R., Ahmad S.S.S. and Ahmad S., 2023. An Improving Long Short Term Memory-Grid Search Based Deep Learning Neural Network for Software Effort Estimation.International Journal of Intelligent Engineering & Systems,16(4). |
[1] | Ashu Mehta, Navdeep Kaur, and Amandeep Kaur. A Review of Software Fault Prediction Techniques in Class Imbalance Scenarios [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2025, 21(3): 123-130. |
[2] | Vikas, Charu Wahi, Bharat Bhushan Sagar, and Manisha Manjul. Trust Management in WSN using ML for Detection of DDoS Attacks [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2025, 21(3): 157-167. |
[3] | Arpna Saxena and Sangeeta Mittal. CluSHAPify: Synergizing Clustering and SHAP Value Interpretations for Improved Reconnaissance Attack Detection in IIoT Networks [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2025, 21(1): 36-47. |
[4] | Seema Kalonia and Amrita Upadhyay. Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Model and PSO Optimized CNN-RNN for Software Fault Prediction [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2025, 21(1): 48-55. |
[5] | Vikas Kumar, Charu Wahi, Bharat Bhushan Sagar, and Manisha Manjul. Ensemble Learning Based Intrusion Detection for Wireless Sensor Network Environment [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2024, 20(9): 541-551. |
[6] | Kalyani H. Deshmukh, Gajendra R. Bamnote, and Pratik K Agrawal. A Novel Approach for Drought Monitoring and Evaluation using Time Series Analysis and Deep Learning [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2024, 20(8): 498-509. |
[7] | Saurabh Saxena, and Chetna Gupta. Optimizing Bug Resolution: A Data-Driven Developer Recommendation System [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2024, 20(8): 510-519. |
[8] | Lakshya Vaswani, Sai Sri Harsha, Subham Jaiswal, and Aju D. Unravelling Complexity: Investigating the Effectiveness of SHAP Algorithm for Improving Explainability in Network Intrusion System Across Machine and Deep Learning Models [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2024, 20(7): 421-431. |
[9] | Ajeet Kumar Sharma and Rakesh Kumar. IoT Malware Detection and Dynamic Analysis of MQTT Simulated Network [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2024, 20(7): 451-459. |
[10] | Abhishek Gupta and Jaspreet Singh. Data-Driven Security Framework for VANET using Firefly and ANN [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2024, 20(6): 344-354. |
[11] | Vikas Verma, Arun Malik, and Isha Batra. Analyzing and Classifying Malware Types on Windows Platform using an Ensemble Machine Learning Approach [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2024, 20(5): 312-318. |
[12] | Harshita Batra and Leema Nelson. ESD: E-mail Spam Detection using Cybersecurity-Driven Header Analysis and Machine Learning based Content Analysis [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2024, 20(4): 205-213. |
[13] | Manu Jyoti Gupta and Parveen Sehgal. Optimizing Credit Card Fraud Detection: Classifier Performance and Feature Selection Empowered by Grasshopper Algorithm [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2024, 20(3): 177-185. |
[14] | Aparna Shrivastava and P Raghu Vamsi. Improving Anomaly Classification using Combined Data Transformation and Machine Learning Methods [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2024, 20(2): 68-80. |
[15] | Ronit Bali, Anukansha Sharma, Shuchi Mala, and Yash Malhan. Modeling the Geospatial Trend Changes in Jobs and Layoffs by Performing Sentiment Analysis on Twitter Data [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2024, 20(2): 120-130. |
|