Multi-Objective Optimization of Cancer Treatment Using the Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimizer (MOGWO)

doi:10.23940/ijpe.23.07.p7.481490

Abstract

Abstract: The use of mathematical modeling to study biological phenomena is one of the best methods available for studying these phenomena. The development of mathematical models for simulating, controlling, and predicting phenomena has always been significant. The application of mathematical models in optimization is one of the advantages of using them. In the context of cancer treatment, the goal is to reduce the concentration of cancer cells during the treatment period through optimal control. An important issue that was not considered in previous studies was the concentration of the active drug, which had a significant influence on the clinical health of the patients. The aim of the current study was to establish a protocol for optimal drug administration by minimizing the concentration of cancer cells and the concentration of the drug. The multi-objective grey wolf optimizer (MOGWO) algorithm was used for the first time to solve this multi-objective problem and the results were compared to those obtained with the NSGA-II algorithm.

Key words: cancer, optimization, gray wolf algorithm, the concentration of cancer cells

Linkai Chen, Honghui Fan, and Hongjin Zhu. Multi-Objective Optimization of Cancer Treatment Using the Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimizer (MOGWO) [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(7): 481-490.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

References

1. Dong-Xin H., Yi J. and Zhao-Xia S., 2021, November. Selection of cancer treatment protocol evaluation based on multi-objective. In 2021 11th International Conference on Information Technology in Medicine and Education (ITME)(pp. 287-291). IEEE.
2. Huo, L. and Tang, Y., 2022. Multi-Objective Deep Reinforcement Learning for Personalized Dose Optimization Based on Multi-Indicator Experience Replay.Applied Sciences, 13(1), p.325.
3. Ghaffari A., Shafigh M. and Nazari M., 2019. Proposing a Finite Duration Cancer Treatment Using Multi-Objective Optimization. Amirkabir Journal of Mechanical Engineering,52(5), pp.1365-1376.
4. Yang C.Y., Shiranthika C., Wang C.Y., Chen K.W. and Sumathipala S., 2022. Reinforcement Learning Strategies in Cancer Chemotherapy Treatment: A Review. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, p.107280.
5. Salas-Benito D., Pérez-Gracia J.L., Ponz-Sarvisé M., Rodriguez-Ruiz M.E., Martínez-Forero I., Castañón E., López-Picazo J.M., Sanmamed M.F. and Melero I., 2021. Paradigms on immunotherapy combinations with chemotherapy. Cancer discovery,11(6), pp.1353-1367.
6. Cazzaniga M.E., Cordani N., Capici S., Cogliati V., Riva F. and Cerrito M.G., 2021. Metronomic chemotherapy.Cancers, 13(9), p.2236.
7. Adhikari S., Bhattacharya A., Adhikary S., Singh V., Gadad S.S., Roy S. and Das C., 2022. The paradigm of drug resistance in cancer: an epigenetic perspective. Bioscience Reports, 42(4), p.BSR20211812.
8. Samy P.G., Kanesan J. and Tiu Z.C., 2023. Optimization of Chemotherapy Using Hybrid Optimal Control and Swarm Intelligence.IEEE Access, 11, pp.28873-28886.
9. Li, T. and Guo, Y., 2022. Modeling and optimal control of mutated COVID-19 (Delta strain) with imperfect vaccination. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 156, p.111825.
10. Wang D., Ha M. and Zhao M., 2022. The intelligent critic framework for advanced optimal control.Artificial Intelligence Review, pp.1-22.
11. Wu X., Hou Y. and Zhang K., 2022. Switched system optimal control approach for drug administration in cancer chemotherapy. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 75, p.103575.
12. Abidemi, A. and Akanni, J.O., 2022. Dynamics of illicit drug use and banditry population with optimal control strategies and cost-effectiveness analysis.Computational and Applied Mathematics, 41(1), p.53.
13. Swan, G.W. and Vincent, T.L., 1977. Optimal control analysis in the chemotherapy of IgG multiple myeloma.Bulletin of mathematical biology, 39, pp.317-337.
14. Parker, R.S. and Doyle III, F.J., 2001. Control-relevant modeling in drug delivery. Advanced drug delivery reviews,48(2-3), pp.211-228.
15. Bhonsle, S. and Saxena, S., 2020. A review on control-relevant glucose-insulin dynamics models and regulation strategies. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering,234(5), pp.596-608.
16. Engelhart M., Lebiedz D. and Sager S., 2011. Optimal control for selected cancer chemotherapy ODE models: a view on the potential of optimal schedules and choice of objective function. Mathematical biosciences,229(1), pp.123-134.
17. Heydarpoor F., Karbassi S.M., Bidabadi N. and Ebadi M.J., 2020. Solving multi-objective functions for cancer treatment by using Metaheuristic Algorithms. International Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Problems & Informatics,11(3).
18. Shi J., Alagoz O., Erenay F.S. and Su Q., 2014. A survey of optimization models on cancer chemotherapy treatment planning.Annals of Operations Research, 221, pp.331-356.
19. Libotte G.B., Lobato F.S., Platt G.M. and Neto A.J.S., 2020. Determination of an optimal control strategy for vaccine administration in COVID-19 pandemic treatment. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 196, p.105664.
20. Cui Y., Meng X. and Qiao J., 2022. A multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm based on two-archive mechanism. Applied soft computing, 119, p.108532.
21. Shindi O., Kanesan J., Kendall G. and Ramanathan A., 2020. The combined effect of optimal control and swarm intelligence on optimization of cancer chemotherapy. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 189, p.105327.
22. Dhieb N., Abdulrashid I., Ghazzai H. and Massoud Y., 2023. Optimized drug regimen and chemotherapy scheduling for cancer treatment using swarm intelligence. Annals of Operations Research,320(2), pp.757-770.
23. Wu X., Lin J., Zhang K. and Cheng M., 2022. Numerical algorithm for optimal control of switched systems and its application in cancer chemotherapy. Applied Soft Computing, 115, p.108090.
24. Zheng J., Zhang Z., Zou J., Yang S., Ou J. and Hu Y., 2022. A dynamic multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm based on adversarial decomposition and neighborhood evolution. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 69, p.100987.
25. Petrovski, A. and McCall, J., 2001, March. Multi-objective optimisation of cancer chemotherapy using evolutionary algorithms. In International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization(pp. 531-545). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
26. De Pillis, L.G. and Radunskaya, A., 2003. The dynamics of an optimally controlled tumor model: A case study. Mathematical and computer modelling,37(11), pp.1221-1244.
27. Mirjalili S., Saremi S., Mirjalili S.M. and Coelho L.D.S., 2016. Multi-objective grey wolf optimizer: a novel algorithm for multi-criterion optimization.Expert systems with applications, 47, pp.106-119.
28. Lobato F.S., Machado V.S. and Steffen Jr V., 2016. Determination of an optimal control strategy for drug administration in tumor treatment using multi-objective optimization differential evolution.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 131, pp.51-61.

[1]	Aashita Rajput, Muskan Yadav, Sachin Yadav, Megha Chhabra, and Arun Prakash Agarwal. Patch-Based Breast Cancer Histopathological Image Classification using Deep Learning [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(9): 607-623.
[2]	Me Me Khaing and N. Jeyanthi. EDocDeDup: Electronic Document Data Deduplication Towards Storage Optimization [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(7): 471-480.
[3]	Yassine Eddouh, Abdelmajid Daya, Rabie Elotmani, and Abdelhamid Touache. Optimization Approaches for Cost Reduction in Preventive Maintenance Strategies: A Comparative Study [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(6): 359-367.
[4]	Yassine Eddouh, Abdelmajid Daya, Rabie Elotmani, and Abdelhamid Touache. Imperfect Maintenance Model for Optimizing Air Compressor Availability [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(4): 263-272.
[5]	Ashima Arya and Sanjay Kumar Malik. An Improved Firefly-Based Feature Selection Method for Software Fault Identification and Classification [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(11): 744-752.
[6]	Jinxin Wang, Zhiping Zhai, Yuezheng Lan, Xiaoyi Zhai, and Lixiang Zhao. Reliability Analysis and Optimization of Forage Crushers Based on Bayesian Network [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(10): 700-709.
[7]	Kanika Wadhwa, Shreshtha Singh, Arun Sharma, and Swaty Wadhwa. Machine Learning-Based Breast Cancer Prediction Model [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(1): 55-63.
[8]	Eshan Misra and Vibhuti. Microgrid Fuel Cost Optimization Considering Economic Emission using Whale Cat Hybrid Technique [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2022, 18(7): 502-511.
[9]	Rajan Prasad Tripathi, Sunil Kumar Khatri, and Darelle Van Greunen. Relative Examination of Breast Malignant Growth Analysis Utilizing Different Machine Learning Algorithms [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2022, 18(6): 417-425.
[10]	Poonam Narang, Ajay Vikram Singh, and Himanshu Monga. Hybrid Metaheuristic Approach for Detection of Fake News on Social Media [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2022, 18(6): 434-443.
[11]	Sanjay Razdan, Himanshu Gupta, and Ashish Seth. A Multi-Layer Feed Forward Network Intrusion Detection System using Individual Component Optimization Methodology for Cloud Computing [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2022, 18(11): 781-790.
[12]	Ruiqi Wang, Guangyu Chen, Na Liang, Zheng Huang. Preventive Maintenance Optimization Regarding Large-Scale Systems based on the Life-Cycle Cost [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2021, 17(9): 766-778.
[13]	S. Anbazhagan, and S. Karthikumar. Multilevel Image Threshold Estimation using Teaching Learning-based Optimization [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2021, 17(7): 638-646.
[14]	D.P. Tripathi, Mahesh Nayak, Rajaboina Manoj, Surarapu Sudheer, and K. Praghash. Fast Computational Efficient Directional Shrinking Search Optimization Algorithm [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2021, 17(6): 543-551.
[15]	Ngangbam Phalguni Singh, Sabbisetty Akhil, Ratakonda Vishnu, K. Kirit Redddy, B. Bhanu Prakash, and Shruti Suman. Investigation of Growth Management and Field Optimization on IOT-based Technology for Chilli Cultivation: Hybrid Chilli (F1 Golden Parrot) in Pallavolu, Nellore [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2021, 17(6): 559-568.