Kshitij Kumar Sinhaa,b,*, Manoj Mathura, and Arun Sharmab
| 1. Verma H., Alavi H.S., andLalanne, D. Studying Space Use: Bringing HCI Tools to Architectural Projects. In Proceedings of the2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3856-3866, 2017.
2. Sinha K.K., Mathur M., andSharma, A. Assessment of Bedroom Utility: Fuzzy Logic Based Approach. In2022 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Speech Technology (AIST), IEEE, pp. 1-6, 2022.
3. K.K. Sinha, M. Mathur,A. Sharma.AI based usability prediction for 3 BHK apartments. In Proceeding of the Springer 8th International Conference on ICT Sustainable Development (ICT4SD), in press.
4. Amireh O., Ryalat M. and Alaqtum T., Narrative Architectural Fiction in Mentally Built Environments. PARAMETRICISM VS. MATERIALISM, pp. 283.
5. Hamdy Mahmoud, H.T. Interior Architectural Elements that Affect Human Psychology and Behavior, 2017.
6. Gosling, S.D., Gifford, R.O.B.E.R.T., and Mccuan, L. Environmental Perception and Interior Design. Body Behav. Space, vol. 242, pp. 278-290, 2014.
7. Edman K.W.The Concept of Value in Design Practice-An Interview Study. In Second Nordic Conference on Service Design and Service Innovation, ServDes2010, pp. 1-14, 2010.
8. Karimi R., Avazpour B., andSepasgozar S.M.Effective Factors on Desirability of Private Open Spaces: A Case Study of Kuye Nasr Residential Buildings, Tehran. Smart Cities and Construction Technologies, pp. 95, 2020.
9. Brkanić I.Housing Quality Assessment Criteria. Electronic Journal of the Faculty of Civil Engineering Osijek-e-GFOS, vol. 8, no. 14, pp. 37-47, 2017.
10. Kwon, H.A.,Kim, S.Characteristics of Residential Space in Response to Changed Lifestyles: Focusing on the Characteristics of Residents and the Relationship between Individual and Family. sustainability, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 2006, 2019.
11. Sima L.A Study on Small Apartment Design in China: Evaluation on the Impressions of and Preferences for the Floor Plans. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 307-314, 2015.
12. Živković, M. and Jovanović, G.A Method for Evaluating the Degree of Housing Unit Flexibility in Multi-Family Housing. Facta universitatis-series: Architecture and Civil Engineering, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 17-32, 2012.
13. R. Matias, Use-value vs Exchange value, https://urbz.net/articles/use-value-vs-exchange-value, accessed on June 10, 2021.
14. Bittencourt M.C., do Valle Pereira, V.L.D., and Júnior, W.P. The Usability of Architectural Spaces: Objective and Subjective Qualities of Built Environment as Multidisciplinary Construction. Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 3, pp. 6429-6436, 2015.
15. Altaş, N.E. and Özsoy, A.Spatial Adaptability and Flexibility as Parameters of User Satisfaction for Quality Housing. Building and environment, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 315-323, 1998.
16. Gzsoy A.,Esin Altag, N., Ok, V., and Pulat Giikmen, G., Quality Assessment in Housing based on Behavioral Data. Research Report sponsored by Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey, 1995.
17. Mitra D., Steinmetz N., Chu Y., andCetin K. Activity Profiles of Occupants in Residential Buildings using the American Time Use Survey Data. In Construction Research Congress2020, Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 1067-1076, 2020.
18. Islam Z.H.,Architects’ Endeavour and User-response: A Post Occupancy Evaluation of Apartments in Dhaka.
19. De Paris, S.R. and Lopes, C.N.L. Housing Flexibility Problem: Review of Recent Limitations and Solutions. Frontiers of Architectural Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 80-91, 2018.
20. Tucker, A. in Search of Home. Journal of applied philosophy, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 181-187, 1994.
21. Cutieru, Pioneers: 6 practices bringing AI into Architecture, https://www.archdaily.com/936999/pioneers-6-practices-bringing-ai-into-architecture, accessed on February 26, 2021.
22. R. Verganti, L. Vendraminelli,M. Iansiti.Design in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 20-091, 2020.
23. Frías C., Peña J.M., Sánchez É., andAlmeida L.BIMBOT-(Artificial Intelligence Applied to BIM Design). EGE Revista de Expresión Gráfica en la Edificación, no. 12, pp. 45-60, 2020.
24. Magarò, A. and Baratta, A.F.Machine Learning and Safe and Inclusive Architecture for Fragile Users. AGATHÓN| International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 5, pp. 109-116, 2019.
25. As I., Pal S., andBasu P.Artificial Intelligence in Architecture: Generating Conceptual Design via Deep Learning. International Journal of Architectural Computing, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 306-327, 2018.
26. Reffat R.Utilization of Artificial Intelligence Concepts and Techniques for Enriching the Quality of Architectural Design Artifacts. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference in Information Systems, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-13, 2002.
27. M. Marsh and M. Sayre, Social Data Brings New Life to AI for Architecture, https://www.workdesign.com/2020/03/social-data-brings-newlife-to-ai-for-architecture, accessed on February 16, 2021)
28. Wiberg M.Interaction Design Meets Architectural Thinking. interactions, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 60-63, 2015.
29. Wang, C.L. and Yoon, K.S.Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics & Mathematical Systems, vol. 404, no. 4, pp. 287-288, 1981.
|||Babaljeet Kaur, and Shalli Rani. Are the Customers Receiving Exact Recommendations from the E-Commerce Companies? Towards the Identification of Gray Sheep Users Using Personality Parameters [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(7): 425-433.|
|||Manpreet Kaur, and Shalli Rani. Recommender System: Towards Identification of Shilling Attacks in Rating System Using Machine Learning Algorithms [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(7): 443-451.|
|||Srishti Bhugra, and Puneet Goswami. Exploratory Review of Machine Learning-Based Software Component Reusability Prediction [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(7): 452-461.|
|||Harsha Gaikwad, Sanil Gandhi, Arvind Kiwelekar, and Manjushree Laddha. Analyzing Brain Signals for Predicting Students’ Understanding of Online Learning: A Machine Learning Approach [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(7): 462-470.|
|||Rakesh Kumar, Sunny Arora, Ashima Arya, Neha Kohli, Vaishali Arya, and Ekta Singh. Ensemble Learning for Appraising English Text Readability using Gompertz Function [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(6): 388-396.|
|||Pranshu Kumar Soni and Leema Nelson. PCP: Profit-Driven Churn Prediction using Machine Learning Techniques in Banking Sector [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(5): 303-311.|
|||Ramneet Kaur, Deepali Gupta, and Mani Madhukar. Learner-Centric Hybrid Filtering-Based Recommender System for Massive Open Online Courses [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(5): 324-333.|
|||Mahima Yadav and Ishan Kumar. Image Processing-Based Transliteration from Hindi to English [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(5): 334-341.|
|||Harshita Batra and Leema Nelson. DCADS: Data-Driven Computer Aided Diagnostic System using Machine Learning Techniques for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(3): 193-202.|
|||Shobhanam Krishna and Sumati Sidharth. AI-Powered Workforce Analytics: Maximizing Business and Employee Success through Predictive Attrition Modelling [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(3): 203-215.|
|||Bhagirath, Neetu Mittal, and Sushil Kumar. Impact of Real Time Fraud Prevention on Online Resale Platform using Machine Learning and Device Fingerprint Techniques [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(2): 94-104.|
|||Shikha Choudhary and Bhawna Saxena. Image-Based Crop Disease Detection using Machine Learning Approaches: A Survey [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(2): 122-132.|
|||Kanika Wadhwa, Shreshtha Singh, Arun Sharma, and Swaty Wadhwa. Machine Learning-Based Breast Cancer Prediction Model [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2023, 19(1): 55-63.|
|||Sandhya Alagarsamy and Visumathi James. RNN LSTM-based Deep Hybrid Learning Model for Text Classification using Machine Learning Variant XGBoost [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2022, 18(8): 545-551.|
|||Ankush Mehra and Sumit Badotra. A Novel Framework for Prevention against DDoS Attacks using Software Defined Machine Learning Model [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2022, 18(8): 580-588.|