
Int J Performability Eng ›› 2026, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (3): 138-148.doi: 10.23940/ijpe.26.03.p3.138148
• Original article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Krishan Pal* and Amit Kishor
Submitted on
;
Revised on
;
Accepted on
Contact:
Krishan Pal
About author:Krishan Pal and Amit Kishor. An Adaptive Multi-Layer Encryption Framework with Zero-Knowledge Proofs for Confidential Smart Contracts [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2026, 22(3): 138-148.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
| [1] |
Ibáñez L.D., O'Hara K., and Simperl E., 2018. On blockchains and the general data protection regulation. EU Blockchain Forum and Observatory.
|
| [2] |
Kaaniche N., Laurent M., and Belguith S., 2020. Privacy enhancing technologies for solving the privacy-personalization paradox: taxonomy and survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 171, 102807.
|
| [3] |
Sánchez D.C., 2018. Raziel: private and verifiable smart contracts on blockchains. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1807.09484.
|
| [4] |
Kosba A., Miller A., Shi E., Wen Z., and Papamanthou C., 2016. Hawk: the blockchain model of cryptography and privacy-preserving smart contracts. In 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 839-858.
|
| [5] |
Steffen S., Bichsel B., Baumgartner R., and Vechev M., 2022. Zeestar: private smart contracts by homomorphic encryption and zero-knowledge proofs. In 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 179-197.
|
| [6] |
Arunadevi S., and Valarmathie P., 2025. Privacy-preserving and scalable electronic health record management using multi-layer merkle trees and zero-knowledge proofs. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence.
|
| [7] |
Chen Y., Chen B., Zhang P., and Che D., 2025. A study on privacy-preserving scholarship evaluation based on decentralized identity and zeroknowledge proofs. In 2025 5th International Conference on Computer Science and Blockchain (CCSB), pp. 204-208.
|
| [8] |
Roio D., Ibrisevic A., and D'Intino A., 2021. Reflow: zero knowledge multi party signatures with application to distributed authentication. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:2105.14527.
|
| [9] |
Kang H., Dai T., Jean-Louis N., Tao S., and Gu X., 2019. Fabzk: supporting privacy-preserving, auditable smart contracts in hyperledger fabric. In 2019 49th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN), pp. 543-555.
|
| [10] |
Ma S., Deng Y., He D., Zhang J., and Xie X., 2020. An efficient NIZK scheme for privacy-preserving transactions over account-model blockchain. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 18(2), pp. 641-651.
|
| [11] |
Jiang Z.L., Xie M., Chen H., Pan Y., Lyu J., Au M.H., Fang J., Liu Y., and Wang X., 2024. RPSC: regulatable privacy-preserving smart contracts on account-based blockchain. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 11(5), pp. 4822-4835.
|
| [12] |
Mihai R., Ozkul O.F., Mihai B., Datta G., Goga N., and Marian C.V., 2024. Privacy-enhanced blockchain recurring transactions using zero-knowledge proofs. In 2024 IEEE SmartBlock4Africa, pp. 1-6.
|
| [13] |
Ma S., Deng Y., Bai M., He D., Zhang J., and Xie X., 2020. A practical NIZK argument for confidential transactions over account-model blockchain. In International Conference on Provable Security, pp. 234-253.
|
| [14] |
Wang N., and Chau S.C.K., 2022. Flashproofs: efficient zero-knowledge arguments of range and polynomial evaluation with transparent setup. In International Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptology and Information Security, pp. 219-248.
|
| [15] |
Kumar N.S., and Devi R.K., 2025. A privacy-preserving route verification framework using zero-knowledge proofs and blockchain in inter-domain routing. In 2025 8th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI), pp. 660-667.
|
| [16] |
Solomon R., Weber R., and Almashaqbeh G., 2023. Smartfhe: privacy-preserving smart contracts from fully homomorphic encryption. In 2023 IEEE 8th European Symposium on Security and Privacy (Euros&P), pp. 309-331.
|
| [17] |
Konda B., Yadulla A.R., Kasula V.K., Yenugula M., and Rakki S.B., 2025. A quantum-resistant privacy-preserving framework for consortium blockchains using blind signatures, hierarchical fully homomorphic encryption, and zero-knowledge proofs. In 2025 1st International Conference on Secure IoT, Assured and Trusted Computing (SATC), pp. 1-6.
|
| [18] |
Agrawal A., Bansal A., Bhatia A., and Tiwari K., 2025. Layered blockchain-based mobile CrowdSensing architecture: exploring privacy and scalability challenges across layers. In International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, pp. 281-292.
|
| [19] |
Castagnos G., Catalano D., Laguillaumie F., Savasta F., and Tucker I., 2019. Two-party ECDSA from hash proof systems and efficient instantiations. In Annual International Cryptology Conference, pp. 191-221.
|
| [20] |
Covaci A., Madeo S., Motylinski P., and Vincent S., 2018. NECTAR: non-interactive smart contract protocol using blockchain technology. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Emerging Trends in Software Engineering for Blockchain, pp. 17-24.
|
| [21] |
Jeong G., Lee N., Kim J., and Oh H., 2023. Azeroth: auditable zero-knowledge transactions in smart contracts. IEEE Access, 11, pp. 56463-56480.
|
| [22] |
Burgos A., and Alchieri E., 2025. Privacy-preserving smart contracts for permissioned blockchains: A zk-SNARK-based recipe part-1. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:2501.03391.
|
| [23] |
Maesa D.D.F., Mori P., and Ricci L., 2019. A blockchain based approach for the definition of auditable access control systems. Computers & Security, 84, pp. 93-119.
|
| [24] |
Ismayilov G.C., and Özturan C., 2025. Trustless privacy-preserving data aggregation on ethereum with hypercube network topology. Computer Communications, 230, 108009.
|
| No related articles found! |
|