Mission Reliability Model of Equipment System-of-Systems based on Weighted Parallel Structure

doi:10.23940/ijpe.19.01.p19.190199

Int J Performability Eng ›› 2019, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (1): 191-199.doi: 10.23940/ijpe.19.01.p19.190199

Previous Articles Next Articles

Mission Reliability Model of Equipment System-of-Systems based on Weighted Parallel Structure

Xu Yan^a, Tailiang Song^b, Junhai Cao^a*(), and Long Gao^a

a Army Academy of Armored Force,Beijing,100072,China
b China Defense Science Technology and Information Center,Beijing, 100072,China

Revised on ; Accepted on
Contact: Cao Junhai E-mail:frank_momo@163.com
About author:Xu Yan is currently pursuing a Ph.D. at the Army Academy of Armored Forces (AAAF) of China. His research interests include weapon system support engineering and equipment support system simulation.|Tailiang Song is a Ph.D. tutor and professor at China Defense Science Technology and Information Center. He received his Ph.D. from Beihang University in 2003. His current research interests include equipment integrated support and project management.|Junhai Cao is a Ph.D. tutor and professor at AAAF. His current research interests include equipment integrated support and project management.|Long Gao is currently pursuing a Ph.D. at AAAF. His research interests include weapon system support engineering and equipment support system simulation.

Abstract

Abstract:

Aiming at the problem that the existing reliability logic model cannot accurately describe the logical relationship of reliability within the equipment system-of-systems (ESoS), the mission reliability model of the weighted parallel structure of ESoS was established based on the analysis of structure and characteristics of ESoS. Based on the traditional system structure, the model considered the mission reliability of each functional system and its contributions to the ESoS. The system contribution was taken as the system weight in the right-linkage structure, and the ESoS mission reliability evaluation model was derived according to the reliability status. Meanwhile, the system was modeled as a redundant system, and the solution of the model with the same and different failure probabilities were given. Through an example and comparative analysis, the rationality and validity of the method were verified.

Key words: equipment system of systems, mission reliability, weighted parallel structure, reliability assessment

Xu Yan, Tailiang Song, Junhai Cao, and Long Gao. Mission Reliability Model of Equipment System-of-Systems based on Weighted Parallel Structure [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2019, 15(1): 191-199.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

Figures/Tables 10

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Figure 6

References 13

[1]	J. Cruickshank and J. Mclaughlin, “The Smooth Structure of the Moduli Space of a Weighted Series-Parallel Graph,” Topology & Its Applications, Vol. 164, No. 1, pp. 242-247, 2014 doi: 10.1016/j.topol.2014.01.012
[2]	W. B. Cao, Q. W. Hu, X. J. Su , “Research on Phased-Mission Success Probability Assessment under Random Common Cause Failures,”Acta Armamentarii, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 776-784, 2017
[3]	Y. K. Gu, Q. X. Zhang, L. Q. Liang , “Reliability Analysis Method of Phased-Mission Systems with Common Cause Failure based on BDD,”Machine Design and Research, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 1-5, 2017
[4]	J. Sun, X. J. Zhang, X. S. Dong , “Availability Evaluation Model for the Heterogeneous System based on RBD,”Journal of Xidian University, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 190-196, 2016
[5]	I. H . Choi and D. J. Chang “Reliability and Availability Assessment of Seabed Storage Tanks using Fault Tree Analysis,”Ocean Engineering, Vol. 120, No. 1, pp. 1-14, 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.04.021
[6]	D. Pedroso and M. Form, “Reliability Analysis using a Parallel Evolutionary Algorithm,”Structural Safety, Vol. 65, pp. 84-99, 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.01.001
[7]	T. L. Song, Y. L. Wong, Y. Fang , “General Philosophy of Support for Materiel Development, ” National Defense Industry Press, Beijing, 2014
[8]	X. M. Luo, J. Yang, R. He , “Research and Demonstration on Contribution Evaluation of Weapon Equipment System based on Task-Capability-Structure- Evolution,”Journal of Equipment Academy, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 7-13, 2016
[9]	B. Xing, J. H. Cao, T. L. Song , “Research on Cooperating Support Model of Equipment Support System of Systems based on Complex Network,” Acta Armamentarii, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 374-382, 2017
[10]	J. L. Zhong, J. L. Guo, Z. J. Wong , “Research on Phased Mission based Efficient Reliability Evaluation Algorithm for Equipment System of Systems,”Systems Engineering and Electronics, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 232-238, 2016 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2016.01.35
[11]	D. J. Anderson, C. M. Carter, T. Brown , “Complexities of System of Systems Operational Availability Modeling,” in Proceedings of Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, pp. 1-6, 2015
[12]	P. Salvaneschi , “Modeling of Information Systems as Systems of Systems Through DSM,” in Proceedings of 4th International Workshop on Software Engineering for Systems-of-Systems, pp. 8-11, 2016
[13]	S. W. Jiang, W. M. Lv, H. Y. Feng , “Reliability Model and Simulation of Equipment System-of-Systems based on Timing Petri Net,”Systems Engineering and Electronics, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 895-900, 2013

Troop	Materiel	Quantity	Failure threshold
Infantry company 1-9	Step vehicle	12/company	8
Self-propelled artillery Company	Self-propelled artillery	9	6
Artillery company	Howitzer	18	12
Anti-tank company	Anti-tank missile vehicle	9	6
Armored reconnaissance battalion	Armored reconnaissance vehicle	42	28

No.	Materiel	Reliability
1	Step vehicle	0.5259
2	Self-propelled artillery	0.6413
3	Howitzer	0.6825
4	Anti-tank missile vehicle	0.5518
5	Armored reconnaissance vehicle	0.4223

No.	Equipment system	Reliability
1	Infantry company 1-9	0.9490
2	Self-propelled artillery Company	0.9870
3	Artillery company	0.9995
4	Anti-tank company	0.9514
5	Armored reconnaissance battalion	0.9086

No.	Equipment system	Reliability weight
1	Infantry company 1-9	0.0715
2	Self-propelled artillery Company	0.0795
3	Artillery company	0.0895
4	Anti-tank company	0.0860
5	Armored reconnaissance battalion	0.1015

Mission Reliability Model of Equipment System-of-Systems based on Weighted Parallel Structure

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 13

Related Articles 5

Recommended 0

[1]	Darius Muyizere, Arcade Nshimiyimana, Theophile Mugerwa, Lawrence K. Letting, and Bernard B. Munyazikwiye. Reliability Assessment of Distribution System Grid-Connected Multi-Inverter for Solar Photo-Voltaic Systems: A Case Study [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2024, 20(3): 149-156.
[2]	Pan Liu and Wulan Huang. Incremental Data Mining-based Software Failure Detection [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2020, 16(8): 1279-1288.
[3]	Haiyue Yu and Xiaoyue Wu. Simulation Method for Mission Reliability Assessment of Space Telemetry Tracking and Command System with Dynamic Redundancy [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2019, 15(6): 1684-1691.
[4]	Shinji Inoue and Shigeru Yamada. Interval Estimation for Software Reliability Assessment based on MCMC Method [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2019, 15(5): 1273-1278.
[5]	Jinhai Wang, Jianwei Yang, Qiang Li, and Hekai Zhu. Remaining Useful Life Prediction for Degradation Process of Gear System with Contact Damage Model [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2019, 15(1): 241-251.