1. Statistical Review of World Energy, Britich Petrolieum, Review of World Energy data for 70 years 70th edition, 2021. https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2021-full-report.pdf, accessed on Febuary. 27, 2022. 2. CH·IV International, Safety History of International LNG Operations (Mar2014) | Liquefied Natural Gas | Leak, https://www.scribd.com/document/236191040/Safety-History-of-International-LNG-Operations-Mar-2014, accessed on March 13, 2021. 3. Landheer B.Central Commission for the Navigation on the Rhine. In Annuaire Européen/European Year Book, Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 156-171, 1974. 4. DNV, The HCR Database - Its Potential for use at Above Ground Gas Facilities, Report for RIVM. DET NORSKE VERITAS ltd, UK, https://www.rivm.nl/sites/default/files/2018-11/DNV-%20The%20HCRD%20database%202LKQW5-7.pdf, accessed on 2022. 5. Nicol, J. Have Australias Major Hazard Facilities Learnt from the Longford Disaster?: An Evaluation of the Impact of the 1998 Esso Longford Explosion on Major Hazard Facilities in 2001, pp. 53, 2001. 6. R. Scott, K. Peter,H. Chris, Failure Investigation Report - Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Peak Shaving Plant, Plymouth,Washington, Operated by Williams Partners Operating, LLC, Plymouth (Unincorporated)/Benton County, WA, 39054, Available: https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/FIR_and_APPENDICES_PHMSA_WUTC_Williams_Plymouth_2016_04_28_REDACTED.pdf, Accessed on Febuary. 27, 2022. 7. Commission blames Esso for Longford disaster, Oil & Gas Journal, https://www.ogj.com/home/article/17230804/commission-blames-esso-for-longford-disaster, accessed on Febuary. 27, 2022 8. Bouafia A., Bougofa M., Rouainia M., andMedjram M.S.Correction to: Safety Risk Analysis and Accidents Modeling of a Major Gasoline Release in Petrochemical Plant. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 614-614, 2020. 9. Ouffroukh L.A., Chaib R., Ion V., andKhochmane L.Analysis of Risk and the Strengthening of the Safety Technical Barriers: Application of Skikda (Algeria) Oil Refining Complex. World Journal of Engineering, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 99-109, 2018. 10. FSA - Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Carriers, Details of the Formal Safety Assessment. IMO—International Maritime Organization. http://www.safedor.org/resources/MSC_83-INF-3.pdf, accessed on 2022. 11. Tixier J., Dusserre G., Salvi O., andGaston D.Review of 62 Risk Analysis Methodologies of Industrial Plants. Journal of Loss Prevention in the process industries, vol. 15, no. 4, pp.291-303, 2002. 12. Sovacool, B.K. The Costs of Failure: A Preliminary Assessment of Major Energy Accidents, 1907-2007. Energy Policy, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1802-1820, 2008. 13. Embarek, M.C. and Hadjadj, E.A.Study of Methodologies for Risk Assessment in Operational System Safety. Journal of failure analysis and prevention, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 540-544, 2010. 14. van, C. J. H. Bosch, den and Weterings, R. A. P. M. Methods for the calculation of physical effect: due to releases of hazardous materials (liquids and gases)?: Yellow Book, The Hague: Director-General of Labour?: Committee for the Prevention of Disasters, 2005. 15. Moonis M., Wilday A.J., andWardman M.J.Semi-Quantitative Risk Assessment of Commercial Scale Supply Chain of Hydrogen Fuel and Implications for Industry and Society. Process safety and environmental protection, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 97-108, 2010. 16. MirallesSchleder, A. and Martins, M.R. Comparative Evaluation of the Cloud Dispersion of a Liquefied Natural Gas Leakage using the UDM and a CFD Model. In International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, vol. 55416, pp. V007T08A050, 2013. 17. API, Management of Hazards Associated with Location of Process Plant Buildings, 2nd Ed, 2003. 18. TNO - The Netherlands Organization of Applied Scientific Research, Yellow book - Methods for the calculation of Physical Effects Due to releases of hazardous materials (liquids and gases), Yellow Book, Committee for the Prevention of Disasters, 2005. 19. Worthington D.R.E. and Xu, Y, MDE Theory Document - OREM, DNV Software Technical documentation, DNV 2010. 20. DNV, PHAST Tutorial Manual. DNV Software, London, 2016. 21. Chamberlain, G.A. Developments in Design Methods for Predicting Thermal Radiation from Flares. Chem. Eng. Res. Des.;(United Kingdom), vol. 65, no. 4, 1987. 22. Johnson A.D., Brightwell H.M., andCarsley A.J.A Model for Predicting the Thermal Radiation Hazards from Large-Scale Horizontally Released Natural Gas Jet Fires.Process safety and environmental protection, vol. 72, pp. 157-66, 1994. 23. Oke A. O.JSFH (Jet Fire) Theory Document. DNV Report, 2005. 24. Cook J., Bahrami Z., andWhitehouse R.J.A Comprehensive Program for Calculation of Flame Radiation Levels. Journal of loss prevention in the process industries, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 150-155, 1990. 25. Baron T.Reactions in Turbulent Free Jets-The Turbulent Diffusion Flame. Chemical Engineering Progress, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 73-76, 1954. 26. Ditali, S. and Fiore, R.A Realistic Assessment of LNG Hazards and Consequences of Release Scenarios, Chemical engineering transactions, vol. 13, pp. 203-208, 2008. 27. Planas E., Arnaldos J., Darbra R.M., Muñoz M., Pastor E., andVílchez J.A.Historical Evolution of Process Safety and Major-Accident Hazards Prevention in Spain. Contribution of the Pioneer Joaquim Casal.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 28, pp. 109-117, 2014. 28. CCPS book: Center for Chemical Process Safety. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2014. 29. IEC 61508, Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safetyrelated systems, 2nd ed., vol. Parts1 to 7.EC 61508, Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safetyrelated systems, 2nd ed., vol. Parts1 to 7. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 2010. 30. Jorissen, R.E. and Stallen, P.J. eds.Quantified societal risk and policy making, Springer Science & Business Media, vol. 12, 2013. 31. Nguyen Q.B., Mebarki A., Mercier F., Saada R.A., andReimeringer M.The Domino Effect and Integrated Probabilistic Approaches for Risk Analysis. InEight International Conference on Computational Structures Technology, pp. 27-34, 2006. |