Rahul Ray*, Shiva Shankar Choudhary, and Lal Bahadur Roy
| 1. Phoon K.K.,Potential application of reliability-based design to geotechnical engineering. In: In Proceedings of 4th Colombian Geotechnical Seminar, Medellin. pp. 1-22, November 2018.
2. Christian J.T., Ladd C.C. and Baecher G.B.,Reliability applied to slope stability analysis.
3. Liang R., Nusier O. and Malkawi A., A reliability based approach for evaluating the slope stability of embankment dams.
4. Cheng Y.,Location of critical failure surface and some further studies on slope stability analysis.
5. Sivakumar Babu,G.L. and Srivastava, A., Reliability Analysis of Earth Dams.
6. Reale C., Xue J., andPan Z., Deterministic and probabilistic multi-modal analysis of slope stability.
7. Zeroual A., Fourar A., andDjeddou M., Predictive modeling of static and seismic stability of small homogeneous earth dams using artificial neural network.
8. Kumar R., Samui P., andKumari S., Reliability Analysis of Infinite Slope Using Metamodels.
9. Karimi I.,Application of Neuro-Fuzzy systems in estimating the response of sediment-filled valleys.10th Int. Fuzzy System Assoc. Congress, 2003.
10. Roger Jang,J.-S., ANFIS?: Adap tive-Ne twork-Based Fuzzy Inference System., 1993.
11. Zadeh L.A.,Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control. 8, pp. 338-353, June 1965.
12. Zadeh L.A.,Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes.
13. P. Werbos., Beyond Regression: New Tools for Prediction and Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences.Ph.D. Diss. Harvard Univ. Cambridge, 1974.
14. Abraham A., andSteinberg D., Is neural network a reliable forecaster on earth? A MARS query! In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). pp. 679-686. Springer Verlag, 2001.
15. Friedman J.,Multivariate adaptive regression splines. JSTOR. 19, pp. 1-67, 1991.
16. Sharda V.N., Prasher S.O., Patel R.M., Ojasvi P.R., andPrakash C., Performance of multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) in predicting runoff in mid-Himalayan micro-watersheds with limited data.
17. Sephton P.,Forecasting recessions: Can we do better on mars.
18. Adamowski J., Chan H.F., Prasher S.O., Ozga-Zielinski, B., and Sliusarieva, A., Comparison of multiple linear and nonlinear regression, autoregressive integrated moving average, artificial neural network, and wavelet artificial neural network methods for urban water demand forecasting in Montreal, Canada.
19. Craven P., andWahba G.,Smoothing noisy data with spline functions - Estimating the correct degree of smoothing by the method of generalized cross-validation.
20. Griffiths D. V., Huang J., andFenton G.A., Risk Assessment in Geotechnical Engineering: Stability Analysis of Highly Variable Soils. In: GeoCongress 2012, 2012.
21. Jain S.K., andSudheer K.P., Fitting of Hydrologic Models: A Close Look at the Nash-Sutcliffe Index.
22. Kisi O., Shiri J., andTombul M.,Modeling rainfall-runoff process using soft computing techniques.
23. Alvarez Grima,M., and Babuška, R., Fuzzy model for the prediction of unconfined compressive strength of rock samples.
24. Gokceoglu C.,A fuzzy triangular chart to predict the uniaxial compressive strength of Ankara agglomerates from their petrographic composition.
25. Yılmaz I., andYuksek A.G., An Example of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Application for Indirect Estimation of Rock Parameters.
26. Sivakumar Babu, G.L., and Srivastava, A., Reliability analysis of allowable pressure on shallow foundation using response surface method.
27. Kung G.T., Juang C.H., Hsiao and E.C., Hashash, Y.M., Simplified Model for Wall Deflection and Ground-Surface Settlement Caused by Braced Excavation in Clays.
28. Prasomphan S.,Machine and S.M., Generating prediction map for geostatistical data based on an adaptive neural network using only nearest neighbors.
29. D. N. Moriasi, J. G. Arnold, M. W.Van Liew, R. L. Bingner, R. D. Harmel and T. L. Veith, Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations.
30. Srinivasulu, S. and Jain, A., A comparative analysis of training methods for artificial neural network rainfall-runoff models.
31. Armstrong, J.S. and Collopy, F., Error Measures for Generalizing About Forecasting Methods: Empirical Comparisons.
32. Ray R., Kumar D., Samui P., Roy L.B., Goh A.T.C. and Zhang, W., Application of soft computing techniques for shallow foundation reliability in geotechnical engineering.
33. Willmott C.J.,On the Validation of Models.
34. Willmott C.J.,Some Comments on the Evaluation of Model Performance. Bull.
35. Willmott C.J.,On the Evaluation of Model Performance in Physical Geography. In: Spatial Statistics and Models, pp. 443-460. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1984.
36. Raventos-Duran, T., Camredon, M., Valorso, R., Mouchel-Vallon, C. and Aumont, B., Structure-activity relationships to estimate the effective Henry's law constants of organics of atmospheric interest. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, pp. 7643-7654, August 2010.
37. Legates D.R. andMcCabe, G.J., Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation.
38. Legates, D.R. and McCabe, G.J., A refined index of model performance: a rejoinder.
39. Gueymard C.,A review of validation methodologies and statistical performance indicators for modeled solar radiation data: Towards a better bankability of solar projects.
40. Behar O., Khellaf A., Mohammedi K., Comparison of solar radiation models and their validation under Algerian climate - The case of direct irradiance.
41. Stone R.J.,Improved statistical procedure for the evaluation of solar radiation estimation models.
42. Viscarra Rossel, R.A., McGlynn, R.N. and McBratney, A.B., Determining the composition of mineral-organic mixes using UV-vis-NIR diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. Geoderma, 137, pp. 70-82, December 2006.
43. USACE, Risk-based analysis in geotechnical engineering for support of planning studies, engineering and design.Dept. Army, USACE Washington, DC., 1997.
44. Taylor K.E.,Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram.
45. Fawcett T.,An introduction to ROC analysis.
46. Mann, H.B. and Whitney, D.R., On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other.
47. Anderson, T.W. and Darling, D.A., Asymptotic Theory of Certain "Goodness of Fit" Criteria Based on Stochastic Processes.
|||Yi-Fan Chen, Yi-Kuei Lin, and Cheng-Fu Huang. Using Deep Neural Networks to Evaluate the System Reliability of Manufacturing Networks [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2021, 17(7): 600-608.|
|||Youssef Bassir, Achraf Wahid, Abdelkarim Kartouni, and Mohamed ELghorba. Estimation of Wire Rope Reliability by Two Analytical Approach [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2021, 17(7): 619-626.|
|||Yi-Hao Chiu, Yi-Kuei Lin, and Thi-Phuong Nguyen. Network Reliability of a Stochastic Online-Food Delivery System with Space and Time Constraints [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2021, 17(5): 433-443.|
|||Saurav Shekhar Kar and Lal Bahadur Roy. Reliability Analysis of a Finite Slope Considering the Effects of Soil Uncertainty [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2021, 17(5): 473-483.|
|||Redondin Maxime, Bouillaut Laurent, and Daucher Dimitri. EM Approach for Weibull Analysis in a Strongly Censored Data Context - Application to Road Markings [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2021, 17(4): 333-342.|
|||Yang Tae-Jin. Comparative Study on the Performance Attributes of NHPP Software Reliability Model based on Weibull Family Distribution [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2021, 17(4): 343-353.|
|||Tyler D. Ridder and Ram M. Narayanan. Operational Reliability Metric to Characterize Radar Detection Performability [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2021, 17(4): 354-363.|
|||Bouzouada Abdallah, Yssaad Benyssaad, Daoud Mohamed, Bekkouche Benaissa, and Yagoubi Benabdellah. Maintenance Optimization for Complex System using Evolutionary Algorithms under Reliability Constraints within the Context of the Reliability-Centered-Maintenance [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2021, 17(1): 1-13.|
|||Priti Kumari and Parmeet Kaur. Connected Data Set-based Virtual Machine Replication in Cloud Computing [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2020, 16(9): 1351-1361.|
|||Achraf Wahid, Youssef Bassir, Nadia Mouhib, Hamid Chakir, and Mohamed Elghorba. Analytical Approach for Damage Reliability Assessment of Wire Rope [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2020, 16(8): 1151-1158.|
|||Pan Liu and Wulan Huang. Incremental Data Mining-based Software Failure Detection [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2020, 16(8): 1279-1288.|
|||Murgayya S B, Suresh H N, Madhusudhan N, and Saravanabavan D. Optimization of High Speed Rotor-Bearings System to Assess the Reliability using XLrotor [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2020, 16(7): 991-998.|
|||Jon Tømmerås Selvik, Ian Stanley, and Eirik Bjorheim Abrahamsen. SMART Criteria for Quality Assessment of Key Performance Indicators Used in the Oil and Gas Industry [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2020, 16(7): 999-1007.|
|||Manish Rawat and Bhupesh Kumar Lad. Joint Optimization of Reliability Design and Level of Repair Analysis Considering Time Dependent Failure Rate of Fleet System [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2020, 16(6): 821-833.|
|||Chunyu Lu and Shaojun Liu. Contact Fatigue Reliability Analysis of Rolling Bearing based on Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2020, 16(6): 855-865.|