Username   Password       Forgot your password?  Forgot your username? 

 

Question-based Methodology for Rating the Severity of Defects in Construction Through on-Site Inspection

Volume 15, Number 7, July 2019, pp. 1760-1771
DOI: 10.23940/ijpe.19.07.p2.17601771

Bessa Rui, Costa Jorge, and Calejo Rui

FEUP, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal

 

(SSubmitted on May 11, 2019; Revised on June 20, 2019; Accepted on July 25, 2019)

Abstract:

The impact of defects in construction is still not well-defined, and it is challenging to quantify all related indirect variables numerically. The majority of the studies in this field focus on the direct impact of defects on costs and planning, neglecting other indirect impacts that are more difficult to measure. Hence, it is vital to evaluate and classify the defects based on their impact, so that priorities can be defined for action both in their correction and prevention. In this work, a generalized methodology to grade the severity of defects was developed based on five impacts: impact on costs, planning, health and safety, system performance, and subsequent tasks.A suitable variant of failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) was selected in order to develop a qualitative analysis methodology to grade the impact factors, severity, and risk prior number (RPN) of defects, based on question forms.Moreover, the presented methodology was applied on-site and compared with FMEA traditional severity calculations applied in the same construction project by the same individuals evaluating the same severity of defects.The obtained results from both methodologies were slightly different, and the authors believe that the identified tendency of different severity levels between both calculations could lead to different risk categories when applied to the whole project. Moreover, it is expected that the proposed methodology can also help separate the impacts for an individual evaluation of the defects.

 

References: 16

  1. R. Lundkvist, “A Proactive Plan-Do-Check-Act Approach to Defect Management based on a Swedish Construction Project,” Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 32, No. 11, pp. 1051-1065, 2014
  2. C. S. Park, “A Framework for Proactive Construction Defect Management using BIM, Augmented Reality and Ontology-based Data Collection Template,” Automation in Construction, Vol. 33, pp. 61-71, 2013
  3. P. E. D. Love, “Revisiting Quality Failure Costs in Construction,” American Society of Civil Engineers, 2017
  4. N. Forcada, M. Macarulla, M. Gangolells, M. Casals, A. Fuertes, and X. Roca, “Posthandover Housing Defects: Sources and Origins,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 756-762, 2012
  5. P. E. D. Love and J. Smith, “Benchmarking, Bench-Action, and Bench-Learning: Rework Mitigation in Projects,” Journal of Management in Engineering, 2003
  6. W. Pan and R. Thomas, “Defects and Their Influencing Factors of Posthandover New-Build Homes,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 04014119, 2014
  7. S. Das and M. Y. L. Chew, “Generic Method of Grading Building Defects using FMECA to Improve Maintainability Decisions,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 522, 2011
  8. H. Aljassmi and S. Han, “Analysis of Causes of Construction Defects using Fault Trees and Risk Importance Measures,” Journal of Construction Engineering & amp; Management, Vol. 139, No. 7, pp. 870, 2013
  9. A. R. Fayek, “Measuring and Classifying Construction Field Rework: A Pilot Study,” Construction Owners Association of Alberta (COAA) Field Rework Committee, 2003
  10. P. E. D. Love and S. Sohal, “A Capturing Rework Costs in Projects,” Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2003
  11. MIL-STD-1629A, Military Standard: Procedures for Performing a Failure Mode, Effects, and Critically Analysis, 1980
  12. B. M. Ayyub, “Risk Analysis in Engineering and Economics,” pp. 33-113, Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York, 2003
  13. Swedish Standards Institute SS-EN ISO 9000:2005: Quality Management Systems – Fundamentals and Vocabulary, SIS Forlag, Stockholm, 2005
  14. CIDA, Measuring Up or Muddling Through: Best Practice in the Australian Non-Residential Construction Industry, Construction Industry Development Agency, Australia, Master Builders Association, Sydney Australia, 1995
  15. M. Villacourt, “Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (fmea): A Guide for Continuous Improvement for the Semiconductor Equipment Industry,” International Semetech Inc., Austin, USA, 1992
  16. L. Barroso, Construction Defects: Tree fault analysis and diagnosis Identification, FEUP, Dep. Construction, 2016

 

Please note : You will need Adobe Acrobat viewer to view the full articles.Get Free Adobe Reader

 
This site uses encryption for transmitting your passwords. ratmilwebsolutions.com