Username   Password       Forgot your password?  Forgot your username? 

ISSUES BY YEAR

Volume 15 - 2019

No.1 January 2019
No.1 January 2019
No.2 February 2019
No.2 February 2019
No.3 March 2019
No.3 March 2019
No.4 April 2019
No.4 April 2019
No.5 May 2019
No.5 May 2019

Volume 14 - 2018

No.1 January 2018
No.1 January 2018
No.3 March 2018
No.3 March 2018
No.4 April 2018
No.4 April 2018
No.5 May 2018
No.5 May 2018
No.6 June 2018
No.6 June 2018
No.7 July 2018
No.7 July 2018
No.8 August 2018
No.8 August 2018
No.9 September 2018
No.9 September 2018
No.10 October 2018
No.10 October 2018
No.11 November 2018
No.11 November 2018
No.12 December 2018
No.12 December 2018

Volume 13 - 2017

No.4 July 2017
No.4 July 2017
No.5 September 2017
No.5 September 2017
No.7 November 2017
No.7 November 2017
No.8 December 2017
No.8 December 2017

Volume 12 - 2016

Volume 11 - 2015

Volume 10 - 2014

Volume 9 - 2013

Volume 8 - 2012

Volume 7 - 2011

Volume 6 - 2010

Volume 5 - 2009

Volume 4 - 2008

Volume 3 - 2007

Volume 2 - 2006

Assessment of Airport Air Side Performability from the Perspective of the Consumer

Volume 7, Number 2, March 2011 - Paper 2 - pp. 121-136

SCOTT WIDENER, MURAT ERKOC, and JOSEPH SHARIT

University of Miami, Department of Industrial Engineering,
Coral Gables, FL 33146, United States of America

(Received on March 31, 2010, revised on August 07, 2010)


Abstract:

Traditional approaches to assess the performability of airports ignore the needs of consumers in terms of the ability to move both passengers and cargo in a timely fashion, instead focusing on the airport as an economic entity. These approaches focus on the ability to generate throughput based upon the available assets at the airport. In this paper, we explore the ability to generate timely throughputs of flights based upon both the assets of the airport and the way those assets are used. We employ widely accepted data envelopment analysis (DEA) to measure performability of the 45 largest airports in the United States using data spanning an eight-year period. The result of these models is a new aviation system diagnostic that identifies weaknesses throughout the entire national airspace to highlight specific areas for improvement and investment for reliable timely throughput. To illustrate the methodology, we present two case studies.

 

References: 27

Click here to download the paper.

Please note : You will need Adobe Acrobat viewer to view the full articles.Get Free Adobe Reader

 

CURRENT ISSUE

Prev Next

Cascaded Trust Network-based Block-Incremental Recommendation Strategy

Shujuan Ji, Da Li, Qing Zhang, Chunjin Zhang, and Chunxiao Bao

Read more

Cuckoo-based Malware Dynamic Analysis

Lele Wang, Binqiang Wang, Jiangang Liu, Qiguang Miao, and Jianhui Zhang

Read more

Colorization for Anime Sketches with Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Network

Guanghua Zhang, Mengnan Qu, Yuhao Jin, and Qingpeng Song

Read more

Bayesian Network Model for Learning Arithmetic Concepts

Yali Lv, Tong Jing, Yuhua Qian, Jiye Liang, Jianai Wu, and Junzhong Miao

Read more

Collaboration System Design of the Transportation Platform

Zhongwen Wang, Dong Liang, Ruizhen Duan, and Mingshan Chi

Read more

Specific Emitter Identification based on Power Amplifier

Zhen Zhang, Jie Chang, Mengqiu Chai, and Nan Tang

Read more

NRSSD: Normalizing Received Signal Strength to Address Device Diversity Problem in Fingerprinting Po…

Chunxiu Li, Jianli Zhao, Qiuxia Sun, Xiang Gao, Guoqiang Sun, and Chendi Zhu

Read more

Fast AIS Data Decoding Algorithm for Multi-Core CPU

Xiangkun Zeng, Huaran Yan, Yingjie Xiao and Xiaoming Yang

Read more
This site uses encryption for transmitting your passwords. ratmilwebsolutions.com