Username   Password       Forgot your password?  Forgot your username? 

ISSUES BY YEAR

Volume 15 - 2019

No.1 January 2019
No.1 January 2019
No.2 February 2019
No.2 February 2019
No.3 March 2019
No.3 March 2019
No.4 April 2019
No.4 April 2019
No.5 May 2019
No.5 May 2019
No.6 June 2019
No.6 June 2019

Volume 14 - 2018

No.1 January 2018
No.1 January 2018
No.3 March 2018
No.3 March 2018
No.4 April 2018
No.4 April 2018
No.5 May 2018
No.5 May 2018
No.6 June 2018
No.6 June 2018
No.7 July 2018
No.7 July 2018
No.8 August 2018
No.8 August 2018
No.9 September 2018
No.9 September 2018
No.10 October 2018
No.10 October 2018
No.11 November 2018
No.11 November 2018
No.12 December 2018
No.12 December 2018

Volume 13 - 2017

No.4 July 2017
No.4 July 2017
No.5 September 2017
No.5 September 2017
No.7 November 2017
No.7 November 2017
No.8 December 2017
No.8 December 2017

Volume 12 - 2016

Volume 11 - 2015

Volume 10 - 2014

Volume 9 - 2013

Volume 8 - 2012

Volume 7 - 2011

Volume 6 - 2010

Volume 5 - 2009

Volume 4 - 2008

Volume 3 - 2007

Volume 2 - 2006

 

Optimal Licensing in a Stackelberg Duopoly Market under Asymmetric Information of the Marginal Cost

Volume 14, Number 2, February 2018, pp. 341-348
DOI: 10.23940/ijpe.18.02.p15.341348

Qingyou Yana,b, Le Yanga, Jieting Yina, Youwei Wana

aSchool of Economic and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, 102206, China
bBeijing Energy Development Research Center, Beijing, 102206, China



Abstract:

In this paper, we investigate a Stackelberg leader’s licensing behavior and its welfare consequence when the rival holds private information about the marginal cost after licensing occurs. In order to examine the effect of the asymmetric information on the optimal licensing strategy, we consider three possible forms of a two-part tariff licensing contract (excluding excluding contract, separating contract, and pooling contract). The result shows that, the optimum is either an exclusive contract with pure royalty on the low type rival or a separating contract with different royalty rates on the different type rivals, which mainly depends on the possibility that the rival is a low type. Furthermore, there is a conflict between the innovator and social welfare when the possibility that the rival is a low type is very high.

 

References: 13

    1. A. Bagchi, and A. Mukherjee, “Technology licensing in a differentiated oligopoly,” International Review of Economics and Finance, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 455-465, 2014
    2. Y. W. Chen, L. F. S. Wang, S. J. Wu, and Y. P. Yang, “Technology licensing in mixed oligopoly,” International Review of Economics and Finance, vol. 31, no. 338, pp. 193-204, 2014
    3. N. T. Gallini, and B. D. Wright, “Technology transfer under asymmetric information,” RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 147-160, 1990
    4. J. S. Heywood, J. Li, and G. Ye, “Per unit vs. ad valorem royalties under asymmetric information,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 38-46, 2014
    5. Y. Li, and T. Yanagawa, “Patent licensing of Stackelberg manufacturer in a differentiated product market,” International Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 7-20, 2011.
    6. S. Kishimoto, and S. Muto, “Fee versus royalty policy in licensing through bargaining: An application of the Nash bargaining solution,” Bulletin of Economic Research, vol. 64, no.2, pp. 293-304, 2012
    7. S. Poddar, and U. B. Sinha, “The role of fixed fee and royalty in patent licensing,” Departmental Working Papers, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 53-69, 2002
    8. P. W. Schmitz, “On monopolistic licensing strategies under asymmetric information,” Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 106, no. 1, pp.177-189, 2002
    9. D. Sen, “On the coexistence of different licensing schemes,” International Review of Economics and Finance, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 393-413, 2005
    10. D. Sen, and Y. Tauman, “General licensing schemes for a cost-reducing innovation,” Games and Economic Behavior, vol.59, no. 1, pp. 163-186, 2007
    11. X. H. Wang, “Fee versus royalty licensing in a Cournot duopoly model,” Economic Letter, vol. 60, no.1, pp. 55-62, 1998
    12. X. H. Wang, “Fee versus royalty licensing in a differentiated Cournot duopoly,” Journal of Economics and Business, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 253-266, 2002
    13. (online since July 20, 2017) (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.06.013)

       

      Please note : You will need Adobe Acrobat viewer to view the full articles.Get Free Adobe Reader

       

      CURRENT ISSUE

      Prev Next

      Degradation Index Extraction and Degradation Trend Prediction for Rolling Bearing

      Xin Zhang, Jianmin Zhao, Xianglong Ni, Haiping Li, and Fucheng Sun

      Read more

      Explore One Factor of Affecting Software Reliability Demonstration Testing Result

      Zhenyu Ma, Wei Wu, Wei Zhang, Jianping Wang, and Fusheng Liu

      Read more

      On-Condition Maintenance Decision on EMU Bogie

      Yonghua Li, Hongjie Yu, Yuehua Gao, and Xiaojia Liang

      Read more

      Lubrication Characteristics Analysis of a Rotor Bearing for Space Application

      Shouqing Huang, Shouwen Liu, Xiaokai Huang, and Fangyong Li

      Read more

      Analog Circuit Fault Prognostic Approach using Optimized RVM

      Chaolong Zhang, Yigang He, Shanhe Jiang, Lanfang Zhang, and Xiaolu Wang

      Read more

      Speech Enhancement Algorithms with Adaptive Methods

      Chunli Wang, Peiyi Yang, Quanyu Wang, Lili Niu, and Huaiwei Lu

      Read more

      Edge Detection Method based on Lifting B-Spline Dyadic Wavelet

      Zhibin Hu, Caixia Deng, Yunhong Shao, and Cui Wang

      Read more

      Word Sense Disambiguation based on Maximum Entropy Classifier

      Chunxiang Zhang, Xuesong Zhou, Xueyao Gao, and Bo Yu

      Read more
      This site uses encryption for transmitting your passwords. ratmilwebsolutions.com