Username   Password       Forgot your password?  Forgot your username? 


Fuzzy AHP-based Comprehensive Evaluation for Smart Grid in Energy Internet Systems

Volume 14, Number 8, August 2018, pp. 1705-1711
DOI: 10.23940/ijpe.18.08.p6.17051711

Ying Maa,b, Yichang Lia, Shunzhi Zhua,b, Nan Qina, Guang Zhaoc, and Chao Huangc

aXiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, 361024, China
bKey Laboratory of Data Mining and Intelligent Recommendation, Fujian Province University, Xiamen, 361024, China
cXiamen Great Power GeoInformation Technology Co., Ltd, Xiamen, 361008, China

(Submitted on May 2, 2018; Revised on June 16, 2018; Accepted on July 21, 2018)


Reliability validation is an important research field in smart grid and involves the comprehensive consideration of various evaluation factors. Because it is difficult to accurately define the indicators of qualitative analysis, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is introduced to evaluate each index and obtain reasonable, comprehensive and effective evaluation results. A novel model evaluation method called fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) is proposed for smart grid in the area of energy internet, and it considers the interaction among the indices. The solution estimates the index weight through the analytic hierarchy process and builds the evaluation model using the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method based on the hierarchy process to assess the performance of the evaluation model with fuzziness. Then, the effectiveness of the method for smart grid is verified by numerical examples. The fuzzy method proposed will provide an alternative technique for assessing different aspects of interaction in smart grid.


References: 13

              1. J. Rifkin, “The Third Industrial Revolution: How Lateral Power is Transforming Energy, the Economy, and the World,” Palgrave Macmillan, New York City, 2011
              2. J. Teh and I. Cotton, “Reliability Impact of Dynamic Thermal Rating System in Wind Power Integrated Network,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 1081-1089, November 2016
              3. A. Arab, E. Tekin, A. Khodaei, S. K. Khator, and H. Zhu, “System Hardening and Condition-Based Maintenance for Electric Power Infrastructure Under Hurricane Effects,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 1457-1470, November 2016
              4. L. Jiang, Y. Yuan, Z. Wang, and S. Wang, “Evaluation Index System and Comprehensive Evaluation Method of Energy Internet in Innovative Demonstration Area of Smart Grid,” Automation of Electric Power Systems, Vol. 1, No. 28, pp. 39-45, January 2016
              5. R. Teng, H. B. Li, and R. Miura, “Performance Evaluation of the Decreasing Energy and Connectivity in the Internet-Connected Mesh Networks with Biased User Mobility,” IEICE Technical Report Mona Mobile Network & Applications, 114, 2015
              6. J. F. G. Fernndez, A. C. Mrquez, and M. A. Lpez-Campos, “Customer-oriented Risk Assessment in Network Utilities,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 147, pp. 72-83, March 2018
              7. T. L. Saaty, “Optimization in Integers and Related Extremal Problems,” McGraw-Hill Book Co. New York-London-Sydney, 1970
              8. O. S. Vaidya and S. Kumar, “Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Overview of Applications,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 169, No. 1, pp. 1-29, February 2006
              9. E. KoQ and H. A. Burhan, “An Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in a Real World Problem of Store Location Selection,” Advances in Management & Applied Economics, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 41-50, January 2015
              10. G. K. V. Dyck and H. M. Ismael, “Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Port Competitiveness in West Africa Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP),” American Journal of Industrial & Business Management, Vol. 5, No. 6, pp. 432-446, June 2015
              11. H. Y. Tsai and Y. L. Huang, “An Analytic Hierarchy Process-based Risk Assessment Method for Wireless Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 60, No. 4, pp. 801-816, January 2011
              12. J. J. Buckley, “Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis,” Fuzzy Sets & Systems, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 233-247, December 1985
              13. T. N. An, D. N. Long, L. H. Long, and C. N. Dang, “Quantifying the Complexity of Transportation Projects using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process,” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 1364-1376, February 2015


                          Please note : You will need Adobe Acrobat viewer to view the full articles.Get Free Adobe Reader

                          This site uses encryption for transmitting your passwords.