Username   Password       Forgot your password?  Forgot your username? 

 

Determining Best Patch Management Software using Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets with TOPSIS

Volume 15, Number 5, May 2019, pp. 1297-1305
DOI: 10.23940/ijpe.19.05.p5.12971305

Yogita Kansala, P. K. Kapurb, and Nitin Sachdevac

aAmity Institute of Information Technology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida, 201313, India
bAmity Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida, 201313, India
cInstitute of Management Technology (IMT), Ghaziabad, 201001, India

(Submitted on November 18, 2017; Revised on March 7, 2018; Accepted on April 10, 2018)

Abstract:

Today's IT infrastructure demands for an automated yet stringently controlled solution to manage patches for vulnerable software applications. The use of patch management tools is the best practice that tests all the available patches before installation to ensure that the released patch will not break the existing software. However, the availability of several patch management software poses a challenge for the system administrator to decide which software facilitates the operational competence and effectiveness of the computer system in terms of revenue and system security. Therefore, selecting the appropriate patch management software that automatically patches all the Microsoft and non-Microsoft products simultaneously is an important and complex concern, leading to the multi-criteria decision approach. Here, we implement a hybrid approach that combines the intuitionistic fuzzy set and entropy weight-based multi-criteria decision making model with TOPSIS to select the best defense against vulnerabilities (or patch management software) in the group decision making environment. As most real world decision problems involve a group of decision makers that may have multiple opinions for individual criteria, the intuitionistic fuzzy weighted averaging operator is explicitly considered here and generates optimal weights for the attributes. A numerical example is provided to illustrate the application of the intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method that helps identify the best patch management tool based on selected criteria.

 

References: 18

    1. F. M. Nicastro, “Security Patch Management,” Information Systems Security, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 5-18, 2003
    2. N. Cain, A. Baron, S. Sharma, and F. Zakrajsek, U.S. Patent No. 962,769, Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, 2004
    3. E. Follis, “Discover the Best Patch Management Software for your Business,” Search Security, 2017
    4. https://one.comodo.com/patch-management/ (last accessed on 20 August 2017)
    5. B. Hale, “Why Every IT Practitioner should Care about Network Change and Configuration Management,” (last accessed on 23 August 2017), 2012
    6. T. Steven, C. Dale, and B. Dan, “Recommended Practice for Patch Management of Control Systems,” U.S. DOI: 10.2172/944885, 2008
    7. B. Louis, “Cloud Desktop/Server in De Cloud,” http://hdl.handle.net/10046/1006 (last accessed on 23 August 2017), 2013
    8. S. M. Welberg, “Vulnerability Management Tools for COTS Software-A Comparison,” Hg. v. University of Twente, online verfügbar unter http://doc. utwente. nl/64654/1/Vulnerability_management_tools_for_COTS_soft ware_-_a_comparison_v2, 1. 2008
    9. F. E. Boran, S. Genç, M. Kurt, and D. Akay, “A Multi-Criteria Intuitionistic Fuzzy Group Decision Making for Supplier Selection with TOPSIS Method,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 36, No. 8, pp. 11363-11368, 2009
    10. K. T. Atanassov, “Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 87-96, 1986
    11. M. H. Shu, C. H. Cheng, and J. R. Chang, “Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets for Fault-Tree Analysis on Printed Circuit Board Assembly,” Microelectronics Reliability, Vol. 46, No. 12, pp. 2139-2148, 2006
    12. C. E. Shannon, “A Mathematical Theory of Communication,” Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 623-656, 1948
    13. A. De Luca and S. Termini, “A Definition of Non-Probabilistic Entropy in the Setting of Fuzzy Entropy,” Readings in Fuzzy Sets for Intelligent Systems, Vol. 5, pp. 301-312, 1972
    14. E. Szmidt and J. Kacprzyk, “Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets in some Medical Applications,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Intelligence, pp. 148-151, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001
    15. I. K. Vlachos and G. D. Sergiadis, “Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information–Applications to Pattern Recognition,” Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 197-206, 2007
    16. Z. Xu, “Intuitionistic Fuzzy Aggregation Operators,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 1179-1187, 2007
    17. M. Zeleny and J. L. Cochrane, “Multiple Criteria Decision Making,” McGraw-Hill, New York, 1982
    18. K. T. Atanassov, “Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets,” Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, Physica, pp. 1-137, Heidelberg, 1999

     

    Please note : You will need Adobe Acrobat viewer to view the full articles.Get Free Adobe Reader

     
    This site uses encryption for transmitting your passwords. ratmilwebsolutions.com