A Plug-in Test Case Generation Method based on Contact Layer Proximity and Node Probability Coverage

Qian Zhongsheng,Hong Dafei,Wang Xiaojin

Table 2 The coverage data of triangle-classifying program

ID Traversed degree Fit(x) Target fitness Target path 1 3.5455 4.8498 4.8498 <st, $d_{1}$, $d_{5}$, $d_{9}$, $d_{13}$, $d_{15}$, $d_{16}$, $d_{17}$, $d_{18}$,ed> 2 4.9545 6.7772 6.7772 <st, $d_{1}$, $d_{2}$, $d_{3}$, $d_{4}$, $d_{5}$, $d_{6}$, $d_{7}$, $d_{8}$, $d_{9}$, $d_{10}$, $d_{11}$, $d_{12}$, $d_{13}$, $d_{14}$, ed> 3 3.4091 4.6632 4.6632 <st, $d_{1}$, $d_{5}$, $d_{9}$, $d_{13}$, $d_{15}$, $d_{16}$, $d_{18}$, $d_{19}$, ed> 4 1.2727 1.7409 1.7409 <st, $d_{1}$, $d_{5}$, $d_{9}$, $d_{10}$, $d_{11}$, $d_{12}$, $d_{13}$, $d_{14}$, ed> 5 5.0455 6.9016 6.9016 <st, $d_{1}$, $d_{2}$, $d_{3}$, $d_{4}$, $d_{5}$, $d_{9}$, $d_{13}$, $d_{15}$, $d_{16}$, $d_{18}$, $d_{19}$, ed> 6 2.8636 3.9171 3.9171 <st, $d_{1}$, $d_{5}$, $d_{9}$, $d_{13}$, $d_{15}$, $d_{16}$, $d_{18}$, ed> 7 7.7727 10.6321 10.6321 <st, $d_{1}$, $d_{2}$, $d_{3}$, $d_{4}$, $d_{5}$, $d_{6}$, $d_{7}$, $d_{8}$, $d_{9}$, $d_{10}$, $d_{11}$, $d_{12}$, $d_{13}$, $d_{15}$, $d_{16}$, $d_{18}$, ed> 8 4.6364 6.3420 6.3420 <st, $d_{1}$, $d_{5}$, $d_{9}$, $d_{10}$, $d_{11}$, $d_{12}$, $d_{13}$, $d_{15}$, $d_{16}$, $d_{18}$, $d_{19}$, ed> 9 6.2727 8.5803 8.5803 <st, $d_{1}$, $d_{2}$, $d_{3}$, $d_{4}$, $d_{5}$, $d_{9}$, $d_{10}$, $d_{11}$, $d_{12}$, $d_{13}$, $d_{15}$, $d_{16}$, $d_{18}$, $d_{19}$, ed> 10 5.4545 7.4611 7.4611 <st, $d_{1}$, $d_{5}$, $d_{6}$, $d_{7}$, $d_{8}$, $d_{9}$, $d_{13}$, $d_{15}$, $d_{16}$, $d_{18}$, $d_{19}$, ed>