Automobile Intelligent Dashboard Design based on Human Computer Interaction

doi:10.23940/ijpe.19.02.p21.571578

Abstract

Abstract:

This paper analyses the development trends of intelligent instrument interfaces by applying full liquid crystal display technology. A novel reference dimension is introduced to consider related design work. In the perspective of design issues: how can we accurately analyse the requirements of drivers with various proficiency for different information, and how can instrument interfaces intelligently adapt to all kinds of drivers? This paper summarises the key points of the design work based on changing interface analysis in new automobile instruments and provides an analytical approach to targeting driving information: the index weight analysis method. A set of scientific methods to judge the degree of information requirements from various drivers in different scenarios is proposed. Therefore, it can improve the current situation that designers mainly rely on personal experience and subjective judgment when they design automobile instrument interfaces, which lacks scientific and objective judgment basis.

Key words: intelligent dashboard, interface design, human computer interaction, information analysis

Mingyang Sun and Haiyang Yu. Automobile Intelligent Dashboard Design based on Human Computer Interaction [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2019, 15(2): 571-578.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

Figures/Tables 8

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

References 16

[1]	L. M. Fu, H. Y. Yu, M.Y. Sun, J. X. Fan , “The Automobile Intelligent Dashboard Design to Enhance Driving Safety,”Advanced Materials Research, pp. 1010-1013, 2014 doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1079-1080.1010
[2]	K. Q. Li , “Review of Status and Future Prospects of Automotive Intelligent Safety Electronics,”Chinese Journal of Automotive Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 5-17, 2011
[3]	J. Föcker, C. Hölig, A. Best, B. Röder , “Crossmodal Interaction of Facial and Vocal Person Identity Information: An Event-Related Potential Study,”Brain Research,Vol. 1385, pp. 229-245, 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.02.021 pmid: 21329679
[4]	F. Joassin, P. Maurage, S. Campanella , “The Neural Network Sustaining the Crossmodal Processing of Human Gender from Faces and Voices: An fMRI Study,”Neuroimage, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 1654-1661, 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.073 pmid: 20832486
[5]	A. B. Zhou, R. H. Zhang, X. F. Ma, J. Zhu , “Interaction of Face and Voice in Status Identification,”Journal of Ningbo University (Educational Science Edition), Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 38-41, 2013
[6]	D. J . Zhao and T. Q. Wang,“Rapid Person Identification Method based on Depth Information,”Computer Systems & Applications, Vol. 23, No. 11, pp. 132-135, 2014
[7]	P. Manfred and E. Johannes,“Driver Models in Automobile Dynamics Application,”Vehicle System Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 7, pp. 699-741, 2007 doi: 10.1080/00423110701432482
[8]	J. Thomas , “Modeling Driver Behavior in Automotive Environments,”pp. 277-292, Springer, 2007
[9]	Z. Z. Sun , “The Development of Graphical Automotive Instrument based on QNX Operating System, ” Harbin Institute of Technology, 2012
[10]	X. Chen and Q. W. Pu,“Electric Vehicles LCD Instrumentation Design based on emWin,”Instrument Technique and Sensor, No. 7, pp. 105-108, 2013
[11]	H. J. Duan , “The Development of a Vehicle LCD Dashboard based on Serial Bus,”Microcomputer Information, Vol. 25, No.5- 1, pp. 110-112, 2009
[12]	K. Cui , “The Analysis of the Cockpit Display Interface’s Color Effects on Novice Drivers’Visual Pre-attentive Progress,”Chinese Journal of Ergonomics, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 35-40, 2014
[13]	G. Q. Zhu, L. Y. Sun, L. H. Sun, K. Cui , “The Analysis of Speed Instrument Danger Prompt Effect’s Influence Factors,”Industrial Engineering and Management, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 129-132, 2011
[14]	K. Wang , “The Use of Automobile Instrument Desk Background Light Color in the Current Market,”Light Vehicles, No. 10, pp. 25-33, 2010
[15]	X. H. Wang , “The Application of Driver-Oriented Design in the Design of Car Dashboard,”Mechanical Management and Development, No. 10, pp. 100-105, 2010
[16]	R. De Croon, J. Klerkx, E. Duval , “Design and Evaluation of an Interactive Proof-of-Concept Dashboard for General Practitioners,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, pp. 150-159, IEEE, 2015 doi: 10.1109/ICHI.2015.25

Index	Symbol	Instructions
Information intensity	R₁	It refers to the prominence degree of color, size, font, line, and other features of the information display that can cause the degree of driver’s attention. The higher the intensity demand, the higher the requirement level for information.
Information timeliness	R₂	It refers to the requirement level for timely information display, including display in advance. The failure to timely display information may cause the driver to make incorrect judgments. The higher the demand for timeliness, the higher the requirement level for information.
Information sustainability	R₃	It refers to the length of time that information is continuously displayed. The longer the information needs to be displayed, the higher the demand level for information.

Demand level conditionsinformation	Skilled driver			Unskilled driver
Demand level conditionsinformation	Parking	Variable speed	Constant speed	Stop	Variable speed	Constant speed
Current vehicle speed	0	88.9	62.3	0	100	93.7
Current rotating speed	0	92.8	75.9	0	78.6	76.5
Current gear	24.2	65.2	44.5	43.9	95.7	87.8
Instantaneous/average fuel consumption	0	73.7	96.8	0	47.0	86.4
Turn signal on	35.1	75.6	79.6	67.8	89.9	98.0
Accelerator pedaling force	0	24.6	8.2	34.3	88.6	85.3
Braking force	0	10.2	8.0	21.0	79.8	62.1
Current water temperature	32.2	62,5	77.8	34.1	63.2	88.9
Current fuel quantity	89.9	69.3	82.9	93.1	65.1	90.6
Total and short mileage	76.8	35.0	76.5	79.5	22.2	73.0
External temperature	78.5	12.3	54.4	87.7	9.2	67.9
Internal temperature	89.3	24.5	78.8	88.3	24.1	91.0
Current time	79.3	34.2	75.9	67.9	32.3	76.4
Current date	65.4	6.5	56.5	53.2	6.7	40.2
Misoperation prompt	87.8	70.8	79.3	78.6	95.8	97.7