Optimization Design of Customized Passenger Car Cockpit Layout based on Safety Ergonomic Principles

doi:10.23940/ijpe.19.02.p15.505513

Abstract

Abstract:

The optimization design problem of customized passenger car cockpits layout is increasingly complexand of growing interest in the Chinesecar market.A new system is proposed to solve this problem based on ergonomic principles.Firstly,based on Kendall’s W, groups and optimization sequences of facilities are determinedusing a combination of Delphi and the analytic hierarchy process. Secondly, the degree of crowdedness in the cockpit layout can be controlled by users’ preference. Thirdly, a particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm is adapted to three-dimensional car cockpit layout optimization, and the resulting inertia-adaptive PSO is compared with some typical algorithms to show superiority. Finally,the results are reasonablyanalyzed in ergonomic simulation software. Thus, the proposed platform is demonstrated to be feasible and effective.

Key words: optimization design, ergonomic, Delphi-AHP, PSO

Xin Liu, Zheng Liu, and Hongzhong Huang. Optimization Design of Customized Passenger Car Cockpit Layout based on Safety Ergonomic Principles [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2019, 15(2): 505-513.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

Figures/Tables 8

Figure 1

Figure 2

Table 1

Table 2

Figure 3

Table 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

References 21

1	W. Fan, S. Yu, W. Wang, B. Qi, L. Zong, “Ant Colony Algorithm for Human-Machine Layout Optimization,”Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering,Vol. 32, No. 7, pp.955-962, 2013
2	H. H. Han, D. F. Han, F. Liu, X. B.Wang, “Research on 3D Layout Optimization of HOV Cabin,”Ship Engineering,Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 76-80, 2013
3	X. Liu, “The Ergonomic Cockpit Interior Design and Evaluation Methods Driven by Hybrid Kansei Engineering, ” Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2016
4	S. Niu and Y. Sun,“The Construction of the Ergonomics Criteria Framework in Civil Aircraft Cockpit Design,” Aircraft Design, No. 34, No. 1, pp.73-76, 2014
5	Z. Q. Qian, H. F. Teng, Z. G. Sun, “Human-Computer Interactive Genetic Algorithm and its Application to Constrained Layout Optimization,”Chinese Journal of Computers, No. 24, pp.553-559, 2001
6	Y. Shi and R. C. Eberhart,“Parameter Selection in Particle Swarm Optimization,”in Proceedings of International Conference on Evolutionary Programming,pp. 591-600, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1998
7	W. Q. Wang, S. Huang, Y. L. Hu, Y. H. Hou, “Particle Swarm Optimization based Algorithm for Ship Vertical Passage Layout Optimization,”Advanced Materials Research,Vol. 479- 481, pp.1885-1888, 2012 doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.479-481.1885
8	N. T.Putri and S. M. Yusof , “Critical Success Factors for Implementing Quality Engineering Tools and Techniques in Malaysia and Indonesia’s Automotive Industries: An Exploratory Study,”in Proceedings of the International Multi-Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists,Vol. 2, pp.18-20, 2009
9	S. Niu, “The Layout Optimization Study for Civil Aircraft Cockpit Ergonomics Design, ” Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautic, 2013
10	J. Kennedy, “Particle Swarm Optimization,”Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, Springer, Boston, MA, 2011
11	S. Önüt, U. R. Tuzkaya, B. Doğaç, “A Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for the Multiple-Level Warehouse Layout Design Problem,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 783-799, 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2007.10.012
12	S. Kulturel-Konak and A. Konak,“A New Relaxed Flexible Bay Structure Representation and Particle Swarm Optimization for the Unequal Area Facility Layout Problem,”Engineering Optimization,Vol. 43, No. 12, pp.1263-1287, 2011 doi: 10.1080/0305215X.2010.548864
13	Y. Li, B. Zheng, Z. Dai, “General Particle Swarm Optimization based on Simulated Annealing for Multi-Specification One-Dimensional Cutting Stock Problem,”in Proceedings of International Conference on Computational and Information Science, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006 doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-74377-4_8
14	F. Liu, M. Sun, N. Li, D. Sun, T. Zou, “Particle Swarm Optimization and its Application of Constrained Layout Optimization,”Computer Engineering and Applications, No. 12, pp.71-93, 2004
15	M. Sun, F. Liu, D. Sun, N. Li, T. Zou, “Layout Optimization of Cube Group in Rotation Module,”Computer Engineering and Applications, Vol. 34, No. 40, pp. 92-94, 2004
16	W. Lee, K. Jung, J. Jeong, J. Park, J. Cho, H. Kim, et al., “An Anthropometric Analysis of Korean Male Helicopter Pilots for Helicopter Cockpit Design,”Ergonomics, Vol.56, No. 5, pp.879-887, 2013 doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.776703 pmid: 23510228
17	K. S. Shen, K. H. Chen, C. C. Liang, W. P. Pu, M. Y. Ma, “Measuring the Functional and Usable Appeal of Crossover B‐Car Interiors,”Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries,Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 106-122, 2015
18	J. Cho and J. Lee,“Development of a New Technology Product Evaluation Model for Assessing Commercialization Opportunities using Delphi Method and Fuzzy AHP Approach,”Expert Systems with Applications,Vol. 40, No. 13, pp.5314-5330, 2013 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.03.038
19	M. N.Rahman and M. A. Matin , “Efficient Algorithm for Prolonging Network Lifetime of Wireless Sensor Networks,”Tsinghua Science & Technology, Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 561-568, 2011 doi: 10.1016/S1007-0214(11)70075-X
20	X. Liu, S. H. Yu, T. C. Gong, Q. Zhang, M. L. Zhao, W. Y. Zhang, “Ergonomics Layout Optimization of the Aircraft Cockpit based on Particle Swarm Optimization,”Advanced Materials Research,Vol. 1044, pp.1851-1854, 2014 doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1044-1045.1851
21	F. Guo, W. L. Liu, Y. Cao, F. T. Liu, M. L. Li, “Optimization Design of a Webpage based on Kansei Engineering,”Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries,Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.110-126, 2016

Dependent Variable	S	S²	S³	Constant
Coefficient	0.1474^***	-0.0144^***	-0.0036^*	1.6566^***
t statistic	9.51	-3.14	-2.18	52.87

	w₁₁₁	w₁₁₂	w₁₁₃	w₂₁₁	w₂₁₂	w₂₁₃	w₃₁₁	w₃₁₂	w₃₁₃	w₄
Mean ranking	6.56	6.61	5.72	8.22	8.17	9.17	2.28	2.33	1.44	4.50
Weight	0.11928	0.12019	0.103981	0.149459	0.148549	0.166719	0.041452	0.042362	0.026188	0.081819

	Optimal solution on x	Optimal solution on y	Optimal solution on z	Minimum values
Classic PSO	280.058mm	101.9689mm	-489.0659mm	20.4334
Linear Decreasing Weight PSO	275.5309mm	105.7848mm	-489.8272mm	20.3536
Inertia-Adaptive PSO	278.2273mm	101.0705mm	-490.3623mm	20.3518
Genetic Algorithm	291.2711mm	118.0944mm	-481.5274mm	20.5983
Ant Colony OptimizationAlgorithm	228.5719mm	89.52847mm	-505.6151mm	21.1401

[1]	Chiranjibi Champatiray, Sonali Samal, M. V. A. Raju Bahubalendruni, R. N. Mahapatra, Debasisha Mishra, and B. K. Balabantaray. Modified Cat Swarm Optimization for Optimal Assembly Sequence Planning Problems [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2022, 18(4): 289-297.
[2]	Bhushan Chaudhari. Role of Swarm Intelligence Algorithms on Secured Wireless Network Sensor Environment - A Comprehensive Review [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2022, 18(2): 92-100.
[3]	D.P. Tripathi, Mahesh Nayak, Rajaboina Manoj, Surarapu Sudheer, and K. Praghash. Fast Computational Efficient Directional Shrinking Search Optimization Algorithm [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2021, 17(6): 543-551.
[4]	Anil Kumar Gulivindala, M.V.A. Raju Bahubalendruni, S.S.V. Prasad Varupala, and Chandrasekar Ravi. Exponential Moving Average Modelled Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Efficient Disassembly Sequence Planning towards Practical Feasibility [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2021, 17(3): 289-298.
[5]	Smriti Sehgal, Laxmi Ahuja, and M. Hima Bindu. Image Compression using PSO-ALO Hybrid Metaheuristic Technique [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2021, 17(12): 998-1004.
[6]	Jinwei Pang, Hongbin Dong, Jun He, and Rui Ding. A Modified Comprehensive Learning Particle Swarm Optimizer [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2019, 15(9): 2553-2562.
[7]	Shuyao Zhang, Ruying Pang, and Jiajia Zhao. Reliability of Human-Machine Evaluation Method for Cabs [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2019, 15(5): 1389-1399.
[8]	Lichun Chen, Junfang Xue, Xiufen Zhang, and Yanliang Wang. Optimization and Reliability Analysis of Movable Jaw Structure of Jaw Crusher based on Response Surface [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2019, 15(5): 1408-1416.
[9]	Chaolong Zhang, Yigang He, Shanhe Jiang, Lanfang Zhang, and Xiaolu Wang. Analog Circuit Fault Prognostic Approach using Optimized RVM [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2019, 15(5): 1453-1461.
[10]	Menglei Li, Hao Liu, Fuxing Li, and Maohua Xiao. Kinematics Analysis and Optimization Design of Multi-Link High-Speed Precision Press [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2018, 14(11): 2798-2807.