Online Lithium Battery Fault Diagnosis based on Least Square Support Vector Machine Optimized by Ant Lion Algorithm

doi:10.23940/ijpe.20.10.p15.16371645

Abstract

Abstract: It is difficult to implement rapid and current fault diagnosis for the lithium battery because of its strong coupling and uncertainty. Moreover, the problem of getting lithium battery fault data will cause a lack of training samples, thus resulting in the unsatisfactory performance of the diagnosis model. Furthermore, once the parameters of the normal fault diagnosis model are confirmed at first, they cannot be readjusted. This will lead to poor generation ability of the model, which is not suitable for the complicated and various lithium battery working conditions. To resolve these above problems, a diagnosis method that is combined with Least Square Support Vector Machine (LSSVM) and optimized by Ant Lion Algorithm (ALO) and Online learning based on sample centre distance, is presented. ALO simulates the process of ant lion capturing ants to implement parameter optimization, which can improve model performance. Online learning based on sample centre distance will remove the samples that have little influence on model training. In this way, ALO will avoid local optimal solutions, and the parameters of the model can be updated according to the new data, thus improving the adaptability of the model to actual working conditions. To verify the possibility and effectiveness of the proposed method, experiments of lithium battery under various fault states are taken. Fault feature data are achieved from these experiments and are used for training, testing and comparing with diagnosis models. The comparative results reveal that the model presented above can guarantee the speed of model parameter updating, showing better generation ability. It's more suitable to implement rapid and current fault diagnosis for the lithium battery.

Key words: lithium battery, Ant Lion Algorithm, Least Square Support Vector Machine, fault diagnosis, online learning

Sibo Li, Yongqin Zhou, Ran Li, and Xu Zhao. Online Lithium Battery Fault Diagnosis based on Least Square Support Vector Machine Optimized by Ant Lion Algorithm [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2020, 16(10): 1637-1645.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

References

1. Y. Lin, X. Zhu, Z. Zheng, et al., “The Individual Identification Method of Wireless Device based on Dimensionality Reduction and Machine Learning,”Journal of Supercomputing, No. 5, pp. 1-18, 2017
2. P. S.Pamograhy and P. Chattopadhyay, “Improved Classification by Non-Iterative and Ensemble Classifiers in Motor Fault Diagnosis,” Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 95-104, 2018
3. A. Rodríguez Ramos, O. Llanes-Santiago, J. M.Bernal de Lázaro, et al., “A Novel Fault Diagnosis Scheme Applying Fuzzy Clustering Algorithms,”Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 58, pp. 605-619, 2017
4. Ms. Pranita A.Raut and Dr. U. L. Bombale,“Overview of Various Industrial Fault Diagnosis Methods,” Vol. 2, No. 2, 2018
5. H. Han, X. Y. Cui, Y. Q. Fan, et al., “Least Squares Support Vector Machine (LS-SVM)-based Chiller Fault Diagnosis using Fault Indicative Features,”Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 154, pp. 540-547, 2019
6. M. L. Suo, B. L. Zhu, R. M. An, et al., “Data-Driven Fault Diagnosis of Satellite Power System using fuzzyBayes Risk and SVM,”Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 84, pp. 1092-1105, 2019
7. Y. F. Lu, R. Xie,Steven Y. Liang, “CEEMD-Assisted Kernel Support Vector Machines for Bearing Diagnosis,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 106, No. 7, pp. 3063-3070, 2020
8. Q. Chang, Y. Q. Yang, X. Sui,Z. C. Shi, “The Optimal Control Synchronization of Complex Dynamical Networks with Time-Varying Delay using PSO,”Neurocomputing, Vol. 333, pp. 1-10, 2018
9. F. Marini and B. Walczak, “Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO),”A Tutorial, Vol. 149, pp. 153-165, 2015
10. X. B. Zeng, Y. Ge, J. Shen, L. P. Zeng, Z. C. Liu,W. Liu, “The Optimization of Channels for a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Applying Genetic Algorithm,”International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 105, pp. 81-89, 2017
11. X. L. Zhang, W. Chen, B. J. Wang,X. F. Chen, “Intelligent Fault Diagnosis of Rotating Machinery using Support Vector Machine with Ant Colony Algorithm for Synchronous Feature Selection and Parameter Optimization,”Neurocomputing, Vol. 167, pp. 260-279, 2015
12. S. Mirjalili, “The Ant Lion Optimizer,”Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 83, pp. 88-98, 2015
13. Y. Lin, Y. Li, X. Yin, et al., “Multisensor Fault Diagnosis Modeling based on the Evidence Theory,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 67, No. 2, pp. 513-521, 2018
14. J. Liu, “Research of Online Learning Algorithms based on Aupport Vector Machine,” ZheJiang University, 2013
15. Y. Lin, C. Wang, J. X. Wang,Z. Dou, “A Novel Dynamic Spectrum Access Framework based on Reinforcement Learning for Cognitive Radio Sensor Networks,” Sensors, Vol. 16, No. 10, pp. 1675, 2016
16. Y. Tu, Y. Lin, J. Wang, et al., “Semi-Supervised Learning with Generative Adversarial Networks on Digital Signal Modulation Classification,” CMC-Computers Materials and Continua, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 243-254, 2018
17. A. L.Suárez-Cetrulo and A. Cervantes, “An Online Classification Algorithm for Large Scale Data Streams: iGNGSVM,”Neurocomputing, Vol. 262, pp. 67-76, 2017
18. W. W.Yan and H. H. Shao, “Application of Support Vector Machines and Least Squares Support Vector Machine to Heart Disease Diagnoses,” Control and Decision, Vol. 3, pp. 358-360, 2003
19. S. Sasikala, S. Appavu alias Balamurugan, and S. Geetha, “A Novel Memetic Algorithm for Discovering Knowledge in Binary and Multi Class Predictions based on Support Vector Machine,”Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 49, pp. 407-422, 2019
20. Y. Z. Wang, Y. L. Ni, Y. Q. Zheng, et al., “Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries based on Support Vector Regression Optimized and Ant Lion Optimization,” Proceedings of the CSEE, Vol. 32, No. 7, pp. 10-15, 2017

[1]	Apoorva Khairnar, Abhishek Patange, Sujit Pardeshi, and R. Jegadeeshwaran. Supervision of Carbide Tool Condition by Training of Vibration-based Statistical Model using Boosted Trees Ensemble [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2021, 17(2): 229-240.
[2]	Kumar Jalan Arun, Patil Shital, and Mittal Gaurav. A Review on Fault Diagnosis of Misaligned Rotor Systems [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2020, 16(4): 499-509.
[3]	Shuo Meng, Jianshe Kang, Kuo Chi, and Xupeng Die. Intelligent Fault Diagnosis of Gearbox based on Multiple Synchrosqueezing S-Transform and Convolutional Neural Networks [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2020, 16(4): 528-536.
[4]	Siyu Li, Shaoluo Huang, Yangyang Zhang, Lijun Cao, and Weiyi Wu. Deep Learning in Fault Diagnosis of Complex Mechanical Equipment [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2020, 16(10): 1548-1555.
[5]	Yunjie Li, Yanyu Wang, Jianchuan Zhang, Detai Zhou, and Dan Mo. HIMM Fault Diagnosis based on KPI [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2019, 15(9): 2476-2483.
[6]	Yu Wang, Shuai Yang, and René Vinicio Sánchez. Wind Turbine Gearbox Fault Diagnosis using SAE-BP Transfer Neural Network [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2019, 15(9): 2504-2514.
[7]	Junxi Bi, Chenglong Zheng, Hongzhong Huang, Xiaojuan Song, and Jinfeng Li. Fault Diagnosis of Wind Turbine Blades based on Wavelet Theory and Neural Network [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2019, 15(7): 1895-1904.
[8]	Shijie Deng, Liwei Tang, Xujun Su, and Jinli Che. Fault Diagnosis Technology of Plunger Pump based on EMMD-Teager [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2019, 15(7): 1912-1919.
[9]	Yuguo Xu, Shixin Zhang, Yong Li, and Jiawang Liu. Ontology-based Fault Diagnosis and Maintenance Process Generation of Electromechanical System [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2019, 15(2): 454-463.
[10]	Xiang Duan, Jianyu Long, Chuan Li, Diego Cabrera, and Shaohui Zhang. Intelligent Fault Diagnosis of 3D Printers based on Reservoir Computing [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2019, 15(12): 3171-3178.
[11]	Xiaoyan Li, Jianwen Guo, Xuejun Jia, Shaohui Zhang, and Zhiyuan Liu. Intelligent Fault Diagnosis of Delta 3D Printers using Attitude Sensors based on Extreme Learning Machines [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2019, 15(12): 3196-3208.
[12]	Jianyu Long, Ying Hong, Shaohui Zhang, Diego Cabrera, and Jingjing Zhong. Improving Extreme Learning Machine by a Level-based Learning Swarm Optimizer and its Application to Fault Diagnosis of 3D Printers [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2019, 15(11): 2972-2981.
[13]	Zhiwu Shang, Xia Liu, Xiangxiang Liao, Rui Geng, Maosheng Gao, and Jintian Yun. Rolling Bearing Fault Diagnosis Methodbased on EEMD and GBDBN [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2019, 15(1): 230-240.
[14]	Yu Sun, Yanlong Sun, Bin Wen, and Lin Tang. Online Learning Behavior Evaluation Modeling and Application [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2018, 14(11): 2886-2896.