On-Condition Maintenance Decision on EMU Bogie

doi:10.23940/ijpe.19.05.p14.13811388

Int J Performability Eng ›› 2019, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5): 1381-1388.doi: 10.23940/ijpe.19.05.p14.13811388

Previous Articles Next Articles

On-Condition Maintenance Decision on EMU Bogie

Yonghua Li^a,*, Hongjie Yu^b, Yuehua Gao^a, and Xiaojia Liang^b

a School of Locomotive and Rolling Stock Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian, 116028, China
b CRRC Changchun Railway Vehicles Co. Ltd, Changchun, 130062, China

Submitted on ;
Contact: * E-mail address: yonghuali@163.com
Supported by:
This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51875073), the Education Project of Liaoning Provincial Department (No. JDL2017022), and the Liaoning Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 20170540129).

Abstract

Abstract: Aiming at solving the problem that the current on-condition maintenance (OCM) time is not accurate, this paper proposes an OCM policy based on historical failure data, real-time condition monitoring data, and the Weibull proportional intensity model (WPIM). Firstly, taking the mean distance between failures (MDBF) during the actual operation of Electric Multiple Unit (EMU) as the design variable and the failure rate of the structure and the wheel set as the adjoint variable, a WPIM model is established. Then, based on the solved model, a physical programming method is introduced to ensure the cost and reliability under the expected range. Finally, taking the bogie as the research object, the effectiveness and application value of the proposed maintenance policy in the bogie maintenance decision-making are verified through analysis, providing a theoretical basis for the OCM maintenance classification and maintenance system optimization of bogies.

Key words: bogie, on-condition maintenance, Weibull proportional intensity model, physical programming method

Yonghua Li, Hongjie Yu, Yuehua Gao, and Xiaojia Liang. On-Condition Maintenance Decision on EMU Bogie [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2019, 15(5): 1381-1388.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

References

[1] P. P. Zhi, Y. H. Li,B. Z. Chen, “Structural Strength Analysis of Bogie Frames Considering Parameter Uncertainty,” China Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 22-29, January 2019
[2] S. P. Zhu, H. Z. Huang, Y. F. Li, Y. Liu,Y. J. Yang, “Probabilistic Modeling of Damage Accumulation for Fatigue Reliability Analysis,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F Journal of Rail & Rapid Transit, Vol. 229, No. 1, pp. 23-33, January 2015
[3] Y. Liu and H. Z. Huang, “Optimal Selective Maintenance Strategy for Multi-State Systems under Imperfect Maintenance,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 356-367, June 2010
[4] Y. Liu and H. Z. Huang, “Optimal Replacement Policy for Multi-State System under Imperfect Maintenance,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 483-495, September 2010
[5] Z. L. Wang, H. Z. Huang,X. P. Du, “Optimal Design Accounting for Reliability, Maintenance, and Warranty,” Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 132, No. 1, pp. 011007-1-011007-8, January 2010
[6] H. K. Wang, H. Z. Huang, Y. F. Li,Y. J. Yang, “Condition-based Maintenance with Scheduling Threshold and Maintenance Threshold,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 513-524, November 2016
[7] H. P. Li, E. Deloux,L. Dieulle, “A Condition-based Maintenance Policy for Multi-Component Systems with LÃ©Vy Copulas Dependence,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 149, pp. 44-55, May 2016
[8] F. Q.Yuan and K. Uday, “Proportional Intensity Model Considering Imperfect Repair for Repairable Systems,” International Journal of Performability Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 163-174, January 2013
[9] S. Annamraju and V. N. A. Naikan, “Imperfect Repair Proportional Intensity Models for Maintained Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 60, No. 7, pp. 782-787, December 2011
[10] Q. Zhang, C. Hua,G. H. Xu, “A Mixture Weibull Proportional Hazard Model for Mechanical System Failure Prediction Utilising Lifetime and Monitoring Data,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 103-112, February 2014
[11] J. H. Zhou, L. Chen, W. Wang,B. Huang, “Multidisciplinary Collaborative Satisfaction Negotiation based on the Physical Programming Method in Product Design,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 157, pp. 258-256, February 2012
[12] A. Rosmaini and K. Shahrul, “An Overview of Timebased and Condition-based Maintenance in Industrial Application,” Computer & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 135-149, August 2012
[13] S. M.Asadzadeh and A. Azadeh, “An Integrated Systemic Model for Optimization of Condition-based Maintenance with Human Error,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 124, pp. 117-131, April 2014
[14] N. C. Caballé, I. T. Castro, C. J. Pérez,J. M.Lanza-Gutiérrez, “A Condition-based Maintenance of a Dependent Degradation-Threshold-Shock Model in a System with Multiple Degradation Processes,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 124, pp. 98-109, February 2015
[15] I. T. Castro, “An Age-based Maintenance Strategy for a Degradation-Threshold-Shock-Model for a System Subjected to Multiple Defects,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 1350016-1350029, August 2013
[16] D. Lin, D. Banjevic,A. K. S.Jardine, “Using Principal Components in a Proportional Hazards Model with Application in Condition-based Maintenance,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 57, No. 8, pp. 910-919, August 2006
[17] H. Mirgolababei and T. Echikki, “Nonlinear Reduction of Combustion Composition Space with Kernel Principal Component Analysis,” Combustion and Flame, Vol. 161, No. 1, pp. 118-126, January 2014
[18] Y. H.Li and Y. M. Song, “Robust Optimization of the Main Girder in Crane based on Physical Programming,” Machine Design and Research, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 78-81, October 2006
[19] G. Reynoso-Meza, J. Sanchis, X. Blasco,G. N. Sergio, “Physical Programming for Preference Driven Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization,” Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 24, pp. 341-362, November 2014
[20] A. Messac and A. Ismail-yahaya, “Multi-Objective Robust Design using Physical Programming,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 357-371, June 2002

On-Condition Maintenance Decision on EMU Bogie

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 0

Recommended 0