Assessment of Salvage Ability of Armored Salvage Vehicles based on AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation

doi:10.23940/IJPE.18.12.P10.30053013

Abstract

Abstract:

Considering a large number of fuzzy uncertain factors in the evaluation of rescue capability of rescue equipment, a quantitative evaluation method is proposed by using an improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. The AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model, through a comprehensive analysis of the key factors affecting the rescue capability, constructed a three-level index system for evaluation of the rescue ability of the equipment. AHP is used to determine the weight of the index, and then the evaluation algorithm is proposed based on the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Finally, an example is given to verify the effectiveness. The uncertainty inherent in normal evaluation method can be lowered, and the conclusion can provide help for more rational selection and improvement of rescue equipment.

Key words: rescue equipment, salvage ability evaluation, AHP, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation

Yong Li, Fenqi Xue, Ying Guo, and Shaohua Wang. Assessment of Salvage Ability of Armored Salvage Vehicles based on AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2018, 14(12): 3005-3013.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

Figures/Tables 4

Figure 1

Figure 2

Table 1

Table 2

References 18

[1]	W. Duan and Y. Lin, “State Evaluation of Transmission Lines based on Fuzzy AHP,” Electric Power Science and Engineering,Vol. 31, No. 9, pp. 33-39, 2015
[2]	Y. Kang, C. Li, Z.H. Dai , “Communication Equipment Technical Support Capacity Evaluation based on AHP and Fuzzy Theory,” Ordnance Industry Automation, Vol.34, No. 10, pp. 89-92, 2015
[3]	G. H. Luan, Y. Q. Pei, D. P. Wu , “The AHP-fuzzy Method for an Integrated Emergency Drills Assessment in Industrial Production,” Mathematics in Practice and Theory, Vol. 44, No. 10, pp. 98-103, 2014
[4]	J. Zhao, J. Mei, J. Xin , “Application of AHP in Emergency Capacity Assessment of Chemical Industrial Parks,” Guangdong Chemical Industry, Vol. 42, No. 14, pp. 72-74, 2015
[5]	F. J. Wang, Z. L. Liu, Z. H. Liu , “A Synthetic Evaluation Model based on Fuzzy-AHP on C~4ISR’s Trustworthiness,” Command Control & Simulation,Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 44-54, 2011
[6]	M. W. An, L. Fang, S. H. Zheng , “Study on Communication Efficiency Evaluation of Tank Transceiver based on Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Fire Control & Command Control,Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 53-57, 2016
[7]	H. Li and G. B. Wang, “Operational Effectiveness Evaluation of Foreign Army’s Aircraft Carrier Formation based on Fuzzy AHP Comprehensive Evaluation,” Ordnance Industry Automation, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 26-28, 2009
[8]	B. Ming, H. Q. Zhang, Q. J. Xu , “Overview on Salvage Technology of Armored Equipment under Battlefield Environment,” Equipment Environmental Engineering,Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 61-74, 2010
[9]	Y. M. Tian , “Quantification Methods of Risk Evaluation Index System for Fire Fighting and Salvage Operations of Fire Brigades,” Journal of Catastrophology,Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 45-69, 2015
[10]	J. Xue, X. B. Zhao, Y. Cheng , “Research on Efficiency Evaluation of Equipment for Detecting Marine Environment,” Computer Simulation, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 219-224, 2012
[11]	G.F. Zhang and J. B. Chen, “Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of System Effect for Missile Weapon based on AHP,” Journal of Sichuan Ordnance,Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 58-61, 2016
[12]	Y. J. Zheng, J. L. Zhang, Y. H. Li , “Assessment of Operational Effectiveness for a Certain Type of Equipment based on Improved ADC Model,” Journal of Air Force Radar Academy,Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 202-204, 2012
[13]	H. Y. Deng, J. S. Ma, Y. Wang, Y. F. Jia , “Tender Evaluation for Artillery Quality based on Fuzzy Comprehension Assessment,” Journal of Gun Launch &Control, No. 1, pp. 20-22, 2008
[14]	K. Feng, J. Zhong, J. Yan , “Feature Battlefield Repair Analysis of the Engineering Equipment,” Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), No. 2, pp. 72-74, 2004
[15]	Q. Chen, C. X. Chen, T. Chen, M. J. Cheng , “Efficiency Evaluation of Data Link System based on Gray AHP-BP Neural Network,” Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, Vol.365, No.3, pp. 109-113, 116, 2016
[16]	L.H. Liu and X. L. Wu, “Study of Battle Efficiency Evaluation of Mortar Unit on Altiplano based on AHP,” Value Engineering, Vol. 33, No. 21, pp. 307-308, 2014
[17]	G. J. Mao, L. J. Duan, S. Wang , “Data Mining Principles and Algorithms, ” Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, pp. 156-183, 2005
[18]	Y.T. Zhang and L. Gong , “Principle and Technology of Data Mining,” Electronic Industry Press, Beijing, pp. 49-57, 2004

Index	Information capability	Maneuver ability	Protection ability	Dragging ability	Lifting ability	Pulling ability	Self-rescue ability	Supporting ability	Rapid maintenance ability
Information capability	1	1	5/3	5/9	5/9	5/9	3/5	5/9	1
maneuver ability	1	1	5/3	5/9	5/9	5/9	5/3	5/9	1
Protection ability	3/5	3/5	1	1/3	1/3	1/3	1	1/3	3/5
Dragging ability	9/5	9/5	3	1	1	1	3	1	9/5
Lifting ability	9/5	9/5	3	1	1	1	3	1	9/5
Pulling ability	9/5	9/5	3	1	1	1	3	1	9/5
Self-rescue ability	3/5	3/5	1	1/3	1/3	1/3	1	1/3	3/5
Supporting ability	9/5	9/5	3	1	1	1	3	1	9/5
Rapid maintenance ability	1	1	5/3	5/9	5/9	5/9	5/3	5/9	1

Level 1 indexes	Level two indexes	Weight	Level 1 index	Level 2 indexes	Weight
Communication ability 0.0799	Communication ability	0.2381	Pulling ability 0.1609	Maximum decoupling force	0.2572
	Command and control ability	0.3333		Maximum traction speed	0.2
	Battlefield reconnaissance capability	0.4286		Average traction speed	0.2572
Manoeuvre ability 0.0894	Fast manoeuvrability	0.3333		Minimum turning radius	0.1428
	Motor capacity	0.4286		Connection mode	0.1428
	Flexible operation level	0.2381	Self-rescue 0.0536	Self-rescue ability of winch	0.3334
Protection ability 0.0536	Body protection ability	0.1579		Self-rescue capability of logs	0.3333
	Armor protection capability	0.1579		Self-rescue ability of civil work	0.3333
	Protection capability of smoke screen	0.2631	Supporting ability 0.1609	Maximum counterforce	0.4375
	Three defense performance	0.2632	Supporting ability 0.1609	Efficiency of earth pushing operation	0.5625
	Performance of protective weapons	0.1579	Lifting ability 0.1609	Rated hoisting weight	0.3912
Towing ability 0.1609	Rated pull of winch	0.225		Rotary angle range	0.3044
	Maximum drag and rescue	0.175		Telescopic arm length	0.3044
	Maximum support force	0.175	Rapid maintenance 0.0799	Power generation capacity	0.1429
	The effective length of the winch wire rope	0.225		Charging capacity	0.2
	Quality of attachments needed for dragging	0.125		Welding ability	0.2
	Auxiliary winch action size	0.075		Cutting ability	0.2
				Quick repair ability	0.2571