Username   Password       Forgot your password?  Forgot your username? 

 

Application of PAA in EPR Nuclear Power Units

Volume 15, Number 1, January 2019, pp. 13-22
DOI: 10.23940/ijpe.19.01.p2.1322

Wen Chen, Zhiwu Wang, Chen Qing, Shijun Chen, Jiefei Chen, Yu Chen, Hong Jiang, and Tao Zhang

CGN/Suzhou Nuclear Power Research Institute, Shenzhen, 518028, China

(Submitted on September 6, 2018; Revised on October 9, 2018; Accepted on November 17, 2018)

Abstract:

Forced unavailability of units not only influences economic indicators of nuclear power units like availability, but also seriously threatens the safe operation of units. It is significantly important for the safety and economy of nuclear power units to reduce forced shutdown times and shorten forced shutdown times of nuclear power units. In this paper, on the basis of European Pressurized Water Reactor (EPR) units for the third generation nuclear power, the application of VVP and ARE systems in EPR units is studied based on the Probabilistic Availability Assessment (PAA) method. Critical failure modes that influence forced unavailability of units are determined by Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA). Based on this, the unplanned shutdown time that influences unit availability is calculated, whether the unplanned unavailability of EPR units can meet the requirements is evaluated, critical weaknesses are identified, and methods of optimization are put forward. The results are a good reference for design and research, system configuration, and equipment selection of newly-built nuclear power units, and they also provide referable opinions and suggestions for improving the reliability of existing nuclear power units.

 

References: 15

      1. K. Ainger, “An Integrated Management Method to Improve the Capability Factor of Nuclear Power Plant,” Daya Bay Nuclear Power Station, No. 4, pp. 76-80, 2011
      2. L. Loflin, “Advanced Nuclear Technology: Equipment Reliability for New Nuclear Plants: Industry Recommendations for Design,” EPRI, August 2010
      3. H. Zheng, “Calculation of Design Availability Factors for Unit 1 and 2 of Taishan Nuclear Power Plant,” Nuclear Science and Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 1, March 2012
      4. “Technical Specification for Operation of units 1 and 2 of Taishan Nuclear Power Station,” Rev A, August 2014
      5. NESS-F DC 20136 A Periodic Test Completeness Note – VVP
      6. S. T. Pang and Y. H. Yang, “Optimization of Nuclear Power Station Overhaul Period,” Daya Bay Nuclear Power Station, No. 4, pp. 23-26, 2008
      7. PESS-F DC 20030 A DES TSN – Periodic Test Rules – VVP
      8. Daya Bay periodic test procedure- Fast closing Test of main Steam isolation Valve, Rev 13, November 2012
      9. Daya Bay periodic test procedure- Partial closure test of main steam isolation valve, Rev 13, November 2012
      10. Daya Bay operating procedure - Test of A Series Bypass Water isolation signal with RPA080CC, Rev C0, May 2011
      11. Daya Bay periodic test procedure- Main control valve closing time test, Rev 13, November 2012
      12. European Utility Requirements for LWR Nuclear Power Plants, vol. 2, Chapter 18, performance Assessments Methodology, Rev E, December 2016
      13. EPR Taishan Nuclear Power Plant, Probability Availability Analysis PAA Guidelines. Internal research report, 2012
      14. S. T. Pang and Y. H. Yang, “Optimization of Overhaul Period for Nuclear Power Plant,” Daya Bay Nuclear Power, No. 4, pp. 23-26, 2018
      15. D. G. Wang, “Study on the Management of Overhaul Period in Nuclear Power Operation Company,” Master Thesis of University of Electronic Science and Technology, 2009

           

          Please note : You will need Adobe Acrobat viewer to view the full articles.Get Free Adobe Reader

           
          This site uses encryption for transmitting your passwords. ratmilwebsolutions.com